Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 12, 2026

ADSC-sheet Transplantation to Prevent Stricture after Extended Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
Published on: February 10, 2017
A multicenter retrospective study on the risk factors of stricture formation after moderate circumferential defect
Tsugumi Habu1, Osamu Goto2,3, Toshiyuki Yoshio4
1Department of Gastroenterology, Nippon Medical School Graduate School of Medicine, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Background:
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an effective treatment for superficial esophageal cancer, but postoperative stenosis remains a considerable concern. Particularly, the probability of stenosis is less investigated in patients with a 50-75% circumferential mucosal defect. We identified the risk factors of postoperative stenosis after moderate circumferential defect resection in esophageal ESD.
Methods:
This multicenter retrospective observational study analyzed data from 513 patients with 50-75% circumferential mucosal defect after esophageal ESD across 19 institutions from April 2018 to March 2022. The risk factors for postoperative esophageal stenosis, including steroid use, were investigated.
Results:
Postoperative stenosis was observed in 28 cases (5%). Multivariate analyses identified prior endoscopic treatment close to the lesion (odds ratio [OR], 5.10), cervical esophageal lesion (OR, 3.97), large circumferential defect (OR, 3.78), and longer procedural duration (OR, 3.83) as the independent risk factors for stenosis formation. In the sensitivity analysis using ridge-penalized logistic regression, only circumferential defect > 5/8 (OR, 3.30; 95% CI 1.56-7.66) and procedure time > 120 min (OR, 3.61; 95% CI 1.39-8.25) remained robust predictors; cervical location and prior endoscopic treatment were shrunk toward the null. Particularly, patients with a prior endoscopic treatment, a cervical esophageal lesion, and more than 5/8 of circumferential defect were likely to have stenosis postoperatively despite steroid use.
Conclusion:
In patients with a 50-75% circumferential mucosal defect after esophageal ESD, steroids were used in > 40% of the patients, with 5% of the patients developing postoperative stenosis. Larger circumferential mucosal defect and longer procedural duration were considered as the most relevant risk factors. Stricture prevention should be more aggressively considered in cases at high-risk for stenosis, even though the mucosal defect area was less than three-fourth of the circumference.
Related Concept Videos
Esophageal Strictures-I: Introduction
Etiology
The primary cause of esophageal strictures is long-standing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), accounting for about 70 to 80% of adult cases. Chronic acid reflux can lead to injury and scarring of the esophageal lining, culminating in...
Esophageal Strictures-II: Clinical Features and Management
Healthcare providers should gather a comprehensive medical history and conduct a physical examination for diagnosis. If esophageal stricture is...
Barrett Esophagus-I: Introduction
This constant acid exposure transforms the esophagus's pink mucosal lining (stratified squamous epithelium) into a type of lining more...
Barrett Esophagus-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
To diagnose Barrett's esophagus, healthcare providers often recommend an endoscopy for those showing symptoms of acid reflux. The procedure...
Esophageal Varices-I: Introduction
Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Clinical Manifestations:

