Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 12, 2026

A Cognitive Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound
Published on: March 21, 2025
Effect of prior HoLEP procedure on multiparametric MRI accuracy in detection of prostate cancer
Austin Drysch1, Kathryn E Fink1, Nicole Handa1
1Feinberg School of Medicine, Department of Urology Northwestern University Chicago Illinois USA.
Objectives:
The objective of this study is to evaluate whether prior Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) affects the diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric prostate MRI (mpMRI) with PI-RADS scoring for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) on biopsy.
Patients And Methods:
We queried the Northwestern Electronic Data Warehouse for all patients who underwent mpMRI followed by prostate biopsy. Demographic information, mpMRI data including PI-RADS score and biopsy data including Gleason grade (GG) were collected. Patients were stratified based on prior HoLEP and highest PI-RADS score of index lesion on MRI. The outcome of interest was detection of csPCa (GG ≥ 2) on biopsy. Logistic regression was performed to assess the impact of prior HoLEP on the detection of csPCa at time of biopsy.
Results:
A total of 8937 patients met inclusion criteria, of which 97 patients (1.1%) had prior HoLEP. HoLEP specimen revealed benign pathology in 38 patients (39.2%), GG1 in 32 patients (33.0%), GG2 in 25 patients (25.8%) and GG3 in 2 patients (2.1%). Average time from HoLEP to mpMRI was 11.5 months. The post-HoLEP group had lower prostate volumes (median 25.0 vs. 47.0 cc; p < 0.001) and PSA density (median 0.06 vs. 0.12 ng/ml2; p < 0.001). Rates of csPCa detection based on highest PI-RADS score were comparable between control and HoLEP groups. Prior HoLEP did not significantly affect the detection of csPCa on multivariable analysis adjusting for age, race, PI-RADS, family history of PCa, and PSA density (OR = 0.97; 95% CI: 0.60-1.57).
Conclusion:
PI-RADS remains a reliable predictor of csPCa after HoLEP despite anatomic alterations. mpMRI should continue to guide biopsy and risk stratification in this population, though larger validation is warranted.
Insights
Prior Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) does not significantly impact multiparametric prostate MRI (mpMRI) accuracy for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). PI-RADS scoring remains reliable for guiding biopsies post-HoLEP.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Radiology
- Oncology
Background:
- Multiparametric prostate MRI (mpMRI) with PI-RADS scoring is crucial for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa).
- Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is a common procedure that alters prostate anatomy.
- The impact of prior HoLEP on the diagnostic accuracy of mpMRI for csPCa detection requires evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess if a history of HoLEP affects the diagnostic performance of mpMRI and PI-RADS scoring in identifying csPCa.
- To determine the reliability of mpMRI in guiding prostate biopsies after HoLEP.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of patients who underwent mpMRI followed by prostate biopsy.
- Patients were stratified based on prior HoLEP history.
- Logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between prior HoLEP and csPCa detection, adjusting for confounding factors.
Main Results:
- A total of 8937 patients were included; 97 (1.1%) had prior HoLEP.
- Patients with prior HoLEP had significantly lower prostate volumes and PSA density.
- Prior HoLEP did not significantly affect the detection rate of csPCa based on PI-RADS scores (OR=0.97; 95% CI: 0.60-1.57).
Conclusions:
- PI-RADS scoring remains a reliable predictor of csPCa in patients with a history of HoLEP.
- mpMRI should continue to be utilized for biopsy guidance and risk stratification in this patient population.
- Further validation studies are recommended to confirm these findings.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Magnetic Resonance Imaging

