Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 12, 2026

A Bedside, Single Burr Hole Approach to Multimodality Monitoring in Severe Brain Injury
Published on: March 26, 2019
Approaches to Mechanical Ventilation in Patients With and Without Acute Brain Injury: A Registry-Based Cohort Study
Yu Tong L Lu1, Shaurya Taran2,3,4, Eddy Fan2,3,4,5
1Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Objectives:
Differences in mechanical ventilation strategies between patients with and without acute brain injury (ABI) remain incompletely characterized. We aimed to compare ventilation approaches in patients with and without ABI over a 10-year period and to investigate impacts of practice changes on Pa o2 and Pa co2 .
Design:
Retrospective registry-based cohort study involving prospectively collected data from nine ICUs across Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Setting And Patients:
Adult patients (≥ 18 yr) receiving invasive ventilation for at least 48 hours from 2014 to 2023 were included. Patients were classified as having ABI (exposure) or non-ABI (comparator) conditions. Between-group differences in tidal volume (V t ), positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), Pa co2 , and Pa o2 were summarized using adjusted linear mixed-effects regression. Six additional ventilation and gas exchange variables were evaluated in unadjusted analyses.
Interventions:
None.
Measurements And Main Results:
Thirteen thousand nine hundred twenty-five patients were included. Mean age ( sd ) was 59.1 years (17.5 yr), 38.1% of patients ( n = 5305) were female, and 25.2% had ABI ( n = 3503). Over the first 7 ventilation days, V t was comparable between groups, with a daily median close to 6 mL/kg (interquartile range, 6-7 mL/kg) predicted body weight. PEEP was significantly lower in patients with ABI (median 5 vs. 8 cm H 2 O in non-ABI patients; p < 0.001). Among patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure, PEEP remained significantly lower in the ABI subset. From 2014 to 2023, V t decreased slightly in both groups, while PEEP remained unchanged. Pa co2 was largely maintained within 35-45 mm Hg in ABI patients and Pa o2 remained largely within 80-120 mm Hg. Differences in six additional ventilation parameters between groups were minimal.
Conclusions:
Both ABI and non-ABI patients received comparable V t that trended downwards over time. Pa co2 and Pa o2 remained largely within guideline-recommended ranges. However, PEEP was significantly lower in ABI patients, including among those with hypoxemic respiratory failure, highlighting potential opportunities to improve PEEP application in relevant subsets.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Mechanical Ventilation I: Indication and Settings
Mechanical Ventilation II: Invasive Ventilation
Negative-Pressure Ventilators
Negative-pressure ventilators create a vacuum around the chest or body to draw air into the lungs, simulating breathing. This method does not require an...
Mechanical Ventilation III: Noninvasive Ventilation
Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation...
Acute Respiratory Failure-IV
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation II: ACLS Airway Management
Acute Respiratory Failure-II
The underlying physiological abnormalities that contribute to hypoxemic respiratory failure include:

