Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 6, 2026

Author Spotlight: Self-Assessment Protocol for Predicting Psoriatic Arthritis in Psoriasis Patients
Published on: March 1, 2024
Patient and clinician perspectives on test result communication in dermatology
Olwyn J Conlon1, Nicola Kearney2, Angela Alani2
1Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Galway, Newcastle Road, Galway, Ireland. oconlon@tcd.ie.
Aims:
To evaluate patient and clinician preferences for communicating dermatology test results (skin biopsies, swabs and blood results) with a focus on differences in preferred methods for normal and abnormal findings.
Methods:
A cross-sectional study was conducted involving two anonymised surveys. A structured questionnaire was distributed to 100 consecutive dermatology outpatients attending a dermatology centre over a four-week period from May to June 2025. Concurrently, an electronic survey was distributed nationally to dermatology clinicians, including consultants and registrars (n = 25). Descriptive statistics and chi-square testing were used to analyse differences.
Results:
For abnormal results, both patients (64%) and clinicians (60%) preferred face-to-face appointments, a further 33% of patients favoured mobile contact compared with 20% of clinicians. A statistically significant difference was observed in preferences for normal result communication between patients and clinicians (χ2 = 92.6, p < 0.001) with patients preferring mobile phone contact (53%) and text message (19%) and clinicians overwhelmingly preferring postal letters (72%). 59% reported that their preference would change depending on whether the result was normal or abnormal. Speed of communication was rated "very important" by 73% of patients. Concerns about digital confidentiality were moderate, with mean ratings of 2.33 for text and 2.32 for email on a 5-point scale.
Conclusions:
Patients favour fast, digital methods for receiving normal results, while clinicians largely continue using traditional postal communication. Greater alignment exists for abnormal result delivery. These findings support a stratified approach to result communication that balances patient preferences, clinical context and confidentiality considerations.
More Related Videos
06:31Precision Implementation of Minimal Erythema Dose MED Testing to Assess Individual Variation in Human Inflammatory Response
Published on: October 3, 2019
09:32Resolving Water, Proteins, and Lipids from In Vivo Confocal Raman Spectra of Stratum Corneum through a Chemometric Approach
Published on: September 26, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Changes in Skin Color: Clinical Perspectives
Albinism
Albinism is a genetic disorder that affects (completely or partially) the coloring of skin, hair, and eyes. The defect is primarily...
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
Sensitivity is the...
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Skin Diseases and Disorders
Gram-positive Staphylococcus spp. and Streptococcus spp. are responsible for many of the most common skin infections. However, many...
Clinical Applications of Epidermal Stem Cells
Skin Cancer
Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC): BCC is the most common type of skin cancer, accounting for about 80% of cases. It typically develops in...