Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2026

Echocardiographic Evaluation of Atrial Communications before Transcatheter Closure
Published on: February 8, 2022
c-TTE and c-TEE with "Curtain effect" for detecting right-to-left shunt in patients with cryptogenic stroke
Zi-Ling You1,2, Da-Jun Chai3,4,5,6, Sheng Cheng7
1Department of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Insights
Transthoracic echocardiography (c-TTE) during Valsalva maneuver or "Curtain effect" is superior for detecting right-to-left shunts (RLS) in cryptogenic stroke patients. This method offers better RLS detection and grading compared to transesophageal echocardiography (c-TEE).
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Neurology
- Diagnostic Imaging
Background:
- Cryptogenic stroke (CS) often involves right-to-left shunts (RLS), necessitating accurate detection methods.
- Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is a common cause of RLS in CS patients.
- Contrast transthoracic echocardiography (c-TTE) and contrast transesophageal echocardiography (c-TEE) are used to identify RLS.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of c-TTE and c-TEE in detecting and grading RLS in CS patients.
- To evaluate the impact of different physiological states (Rest, Valsalva Maneuver, "Curtain effect") on RLS detection.
- To determine the optimal echocardiographic method for RLS assessment in CS.
Main Methods:
- 150 CS patients underwent both c-TTE and c-TEE.
- Echocardiography was performed at Rest, during Valsalva Maneuver, and during the "Curtain effect" (post-Valsalva).
- RLS detection and semiquantitative grading were based on microbubble characteristics in the left atrium.
Main Results:
- c-TTE during Valsalva maneuver detected significantly more RLS than c-TEE (83.3% vs 65.3%, P < .05).
- c-TTE during the "Curtain effect" revealed more PFO-RLS and higher grades than at Rest (91.8% vs 72.7%, P < .05).
- c-TTE consistently showed higher grades of PFO-RLS compared to c-TEE across all states (P < .05).
Conclusions:
- c-TTE, particularly during Valsalva maneuver or "Curtain effect", demonstrates superiority over c-TEE for RLS detection and PFO-RLS grading in CS patients.
- These enhanced c-TTE states can serve as a practical and effective screening approach for suspected RLS in CS.
- Improved RLS detection may aid in identifying stroke etiology and guiding therapeutic strategies.
Abstract:
This study compares right heart contrast transthoracic echocardiography (c-TTE) and contrast transesophageal echocardiography (c-TEE) at different states for detecting and grading the right-to-left shunt (RLS) in patients with cryptogenic stroke (CS). A total of 150 CS patients were enrolled. All patients underwent c-TTE and c-TEE at 3 different states: the Rest, the Valsalva Maneuver, and the state of rest shortly after the Valsalva Maneuver (referred to as "Curtain effect"). Right-to-left shunt due to patent foramen ovale (PFO-RLS) or pulmonary right-to-left shunt was identified by the microbubble characteristics in the left atrium. The detection rates and semiquantitative grades of RLS were compared between c-TTE and c-TEE under different states. c-TTE at Valsalva Maneuver detected more RLS than c-TEE (83.3% vs 65.3%, P < .05). c-TTE at "Curtain effect" revealed more PFO-RLS and higher grades of PFO-RLS than c-TTE at Rest (91.8% vs 72.7%, P < .05). c-TTE showed higher grades of PFO-RLS compared to c-TEE at any state (P < .05). c-TTE at Valsalva Maneuver or "Curtain effect" has superiority in detecting RLS and grading PFO-RLS compared to c-TEE; it can be a practical screening approach for suspected RLS in CS patients.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System II:Types of Echocardiography
Types of Echocardiography
Transthoracic Echocardiography (TTE)
TTE is the most common type of echocardiogram which involves placing a transducer on the patient's chest, emitting sound waves to create heart images. TTE is invaluable for evaluating the heart's size, structure, and motion, making it particularly useful for diagnosing...
Transient Ischemic Attack l: Introduction

