Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 12, 2026

Field-Based Thermal Physiology Assay: Cold Shock Recovery under Ambient Conditions
Published on: March 9, 2021
Suboptimal is good enough: Aligning thermal sensitivity to habitat temperature across season
Jack W Litle1,2, Emily Carrington1,2
1Department of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Abstract:
Predicting the thermal performance of organisms is crucial for understanding the effects of climate warming. In ectotherms, organismal performance depends on how well aligned the thermal sensitivities of fitness components are to body temperatures in the natural habitat. It is frequently assumed that Topt (temperatures that maximize performance) for important fitness components has evolved to align with habitat temperatures. However, most organisms at temperate latitudes experience significant seasonal temperature variation, and therefore frequently operate at suboptimal temperatures. Importantly, seasonal performance patterns may differ among fitness components if those components have different thermal sensitivities. The extent to which habitat temperature can deviate from Topt before an organism can no longer persist in its environment, and the role of seasonality in driving this deviation, is infrequently explored. Here, we assess how well aligned the thermal sensitivity (thermal performance curves, or TPCs) of development, growth and survival is to local habitat temperatures across two seasons using embryos of the marine gastropod Haminoea vesicula. We develop a mechanistic model by integrating thermal sensitivity for development, growth and survival with habitat temperatures to predict embryo performance across seasons. Our results demonstrate that habitat temperatures mostly fall far below Topt for development and growth. Accordingly, model predictions show that in the cool spring, developmental periods are 20% longer and hatchling sizes are slightly (~1%) smaller on average than in the summer. Survival risk intensifies in the summer due to an acute high-temperature event, indicating that seasonal temperature variation affects performance differently between fitness components. We horizontally shift TPC functions to assess how well aligned the thermal sensitivity of each fitness component is to habitat temperatures. Simulations indicate that thermal sensitivity for survival is well aligned to habitat temperature, but Topt for development and growth would need to cold shift by 11°C and 16°C, respectively, to achieve maximal performance. However, cold shifting TPCs to maximize development and growth results in sharp survival reductions due to summer heat spikes. Overall, Topt greatly exceeds the most frequent habitat temperatures, leading to suboptimal performance most of the time. However, high Topt allows embryos to survive seasonally driven heat spikes. Sometimes 'suboptimal' is good enough.
Related Concept Videos
Biological Clocks and Seasonal Responses
Thermoregulation
Thermosensation
Positive and Negative Feedback Loops
Responses to Heat and Cold Stress
Temperature and Thermal Equilibrium
The concept of temperature has evolved from the common concepts of hot and cold. The scientific definition of temperature explains more than just our sense of hot and cold. Temperature is operationally defined as the quantity measured with a thermometer. Furthermore, temperature is...

