Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

SBAR II: Application of SBAR01:14

SBAR II: Application of SBAR

SBAR is an effective communication tool used by healthcare professionals to communicate patient information accurately. SBAR stands for Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation. For a better understanding, an example is given below.
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation01:20

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

Evaluation of the teaching process enables the nurse to determine if the patient's learning needs were met and if training was effective. If the expected outcomes are not met, the care plan is revised, and additional education or reinforcement is provided. Nurses can ask questions after the session or obtain feedback to assess the patient's understanding of the topic.
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning, patient...
Nursing Evaluation01:15

Nursing Evaluation

The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
Section...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comprehensive, Person-Centered Assessment of Persons Living With Aphasia.

Professional case management·2026
Same author

Psychometric properties of suicide risk assessments in young Black populations internationally: a scoping review.

Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology·2026
Same author

Gender Matters, Age Counts: Patterns of Antipsychotic Prescribing in Canadian Long-Term Care Homes.

Healthcare management forum·2026
Same author

Symptoms of Mood Disturbance and Depression Diagnosis Among South Asian Home Care Clients in Ontario, Canada: Evidence of Under-Detection of Mental Health Needs.

International journal of geriatric psychiatry·2026
Same author

Barriers and facilitators to data-informed care planning in long-term care in Nova Scotia, Canada: a qualitative study.

BMC health services research·2026
Same author

Interventions for fatigue management after traumatic brain injury.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 28, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

Educational Approaches for Successful Implementation of interRAI Assessment Systems.

Brigette Meehan1, Mary James2, Bonnie A Pearson3

  • 1University of Otago, Dunedin North, New Zealand.

Healthcare Management Forum
|November 10, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A robust education strategy is crucial for effective implementation and use of interRAI assessments. This ensures data informs healthcare decisions across all levels, from individual care to system-wide policy.

More Related Videos

Mixed Reality for Education (MRE) Implementation and Results in Online Classes for Engineering
04:12

Mixed Reality for Education (MRE) Implementation and Results in Online Classes for Engineering

Published on: June 23, 2023

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 28, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

Mixed Reality for Education (MRE) Implementation and Results in Online Classes for Engineering
04:12

Mixed Reality for Education (MRE) Implementation and Results in Online Classes for Engineering

Published on: June 23, 2023

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Informatics
  • Health Services Research
  • Educational Technology

Background:

  • Routine interRAI assessments generate valuable data for healthcare decision-making at multiple levels.
  • Effective implementation and sustained use of interRAI systems necessitate a comprehensive education strategy.
  • Existing educational approaches may not adequately address the diverse needs of interRAI users.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline instructional design strategies for developing an interRAI educational program.
  • To provide specific delivery suggestions tailored to distinct user groups.
  • To support the optimal utilization of interRAI data for improved healthcare outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • Review of instructional design principles relevant to healthcare education.
  • Analysis of interRAI assessment data and its application across different user roles.
  • Development of a tiered educational framework based on user needs and data interaction.

Main Results:

  • Identification of key educational needs for interRAI assessors, clinicians, and end-users.
  • Proposal of tailored content and delivery methods for each target audience.
  • Emphasis on a sustainable education model to ensure long-term proficiency and data use.

Conclusions:

  • A well-structured, sustainable education strategy is essential for maximizing the benefits of interRAI assessments.
  • Targeted educational interventions enhance the accuracy of assessments and the utility of data.
  • Investing in education empowers healthcare professionals and administrators to leverage interRAI data effectively.