Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 11, 2026

Ex Situ Normothermic Machine Perfusion of Donor Livers
Published on: May 26, 2015
A Comprehensive Analysis on the Impact of Hypothermic Machine Perfusion and its Influence on Delayed Graft Function
Zhihao Li1, Mohammed Y Mahgoub2, Ahmed Zeen Alabedeen Alrifai2
1Division of Transplantation Surgery, Mayo Clinic Transplant Center, Rochester, MN.
Background:
Delayed graft function (DGF) in deceased-donor kidney transplantation increases morbidity, prolongs hospitalization, and increases healthcare costs. Hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) has emerged as a promising strategy to reduce DGF; however, large-scale real-world data remain limited.
Methods:
We performed a retrospective cohort analysis using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (2014-2024), including adult dialysis-dependent recipients of deceased-donor kidneys preserved using either static cold storage (SCS) or HMP. The primary outcome was DGF, defined as dialysis requirement within 7 d posttransplant. A matched-pairs analysis was conducted using kidneys from the same donor.
Results:
The overall cohort included 59 859 recipients (46.8% SCS, 53.2% HMP), with 2208 matched pairs identified. In the overall cohort, HMP grafts had longer cold ischemia times and a higher kidney donor risk index. They were more frequently obtained from older and donation after circulatory death donors. Although the overall DGF incidence was higher with HMP (34.4% versus 30.9%, P < 0.001), matched-pairs analysis revealed significantly lower DGF rates with HMP (29.8% versus 36.1%, P < 0.001). Adjusted analyses identified HMP as protective against DGF (overall cohort odds ratio, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.66-0.78; paired cohort OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.50-0.93). Additional modifiable risk factors include prolonged cold ischemia time, higher recipient body mass index, and longer dialysis duration.
Conclusions:
This real-world study demonstrates that HMP is associated with a significant reduction in DGF risk in kidney transplantation compared with SCS, supporting its broader implementation and targeted management of modifiable risk factors.

