Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 11, 2026

Author Spotlight: A Novel Protocol for Intracameral Injections to Enhance Precision in Rodent Ophthalmology
Published on: May 31, 2024
Topical Povidone Iodine 2.5% Versus 5% for Endophthalmitis Prophylaxis During Intravitreal Injections
Radwan S Ajlan1, Shreeya Dalla1, Riya J Parikh1
1Department of Ophthalmology, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.
Purpose:
Topical povidone iodine (PI) has been shown to reduce the risk of endophthalmitis following intravitreal injections (IVIs). However, PI is a known ocular irritant and can result in significant eye discomfort. Currently, 5% PI is the most used concentration for ocular surface disinfection prior to IVI. 2.5% PI has been proposed as an alternative IVI preparation to lessen PI-associated ocular irritation. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of topical PI 2.5% to PI 5% in preventing post-IVI endophthalmitis at a single academic institution location.
Methods:
A retrospective chart review was conducted at a single academic institution location of patients receiving IVI from August 1st, 2017, to June 15th, 2022. IVIs were performed using PI 2.5% or PI 5%. PI 5% was applied to the ocular surface 60 s before IVI. PI 2.5% was applied over the ocular surface and then reapplied 4-5 min later over the injection site and fornices before IVI.
Results:
A total of 7360 IVIs were performed in 773 patients (473 patients on 2.5% and 300 on 5% PI). 52.0% of IVIs were performed with 2.5% PI (n = 3826) and 48.0% were performed with 5% PI (n = 3534). The mean age of patients was 66.8 years for the 2.5% PI group and 69.1 years for the 5% PI subgroup (p=0.044). Three cases of endophthalmitis were identified in the 5% PI subgroup (0.08%), and no cases of endophthalmitis were identified in the 2.5% PI subgroup. All cases of endophthalmitis were treated with prompt intravitreal antimicrobial injection.
Conclusion:
In this retrospective study, we found that 2.5% and 5% PI had similar results in preventing post-IVI endophthalmitis. This study adds to the literature by further supporting the antiseptic effect of 2.5% PI for IVI. Larger prospective studies are needed to further clarify the antiseptic effect and ocular surface irritation associated with 2.5% PI use.
Related Concept Videos
Hand hygiene
Hand washing...
Open Angle Glaucoma: Treatment
Drugs such as carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, α2- and...
Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Stability-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence
Angle Closure Glaucoma: Treatment

