Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2026

A Strategy to Identify de Novo Mutations in Common Disorders such as Autism and Schizophrenia
Published on: June 15, 2011
Attitudes toward returning pathogenic KCNQ1 variant and uptake of cascade screening in the Amish
Elizabeth A Streeten1, Yue Guan2, Kathleen A Ryan1
1University of Maryland Department of Medicine and Program in Personalized and Genomic Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Purpose:
To assess the experience of Amish regarding return of results (RoR) of long QT syndrome founder variant KCNQ1 p.(Thr224Met), information sharing, and uptake of beta-blockers, and variant testing in at-risk family members (cascade testing).
Methods:
Probands (n = 88) with KCNQ1 p.(Thr224Met), previously identified by exome sequencing, after RoR, were mailed: (1) survey on attitudes toward RoR and (2) response card indicating interest in free, in-home cascade testing of first-degree relatives, indicating contact preference by study team (direct contact) or proband. Participant recall of beta blocker recommendation was compared with notes from RoR counseling.
Results:
Surveys were received from 33 of 88 (37.5%) participants. Positive perceptions of the utility of genetic testing were reported (mean = 32.1, SD = 3.4, range 25-38). Of 23 respondents recalling that a beta blocker was recommended, 4 (17.4%) were taking one. Cascade testing interest responses were received from 69 of 88 (78%) participants; 25 expressed interest in cascade testing of children or information for family members. Most participants chose direct contact (90%). Seventy-nine family members (63 children, 16 siblings) from 18 families were tested, all through direct contact.
Conclusion:
The RoR process was well received, although uptake of beta blockers was low. Cascade testing interest was modest; however, most followed through on testing. These results help to inform strategies to improve cascade testing in this population.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Non-gated Ion Channels
Compared to the gated ion channels, the non-gated channels, also known as leakage or passive channels, have no gating mechanism.
Non-gated Ion Channels
Compared to the gated ion channels, the non-gated channels, also known as leakage or passive channels, have no gating mechanism.
Ligand-Gated Ion Channel Receptor: Gating Mechanism

