Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 11, 2026
The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
Implementation of Social Needs Screening and Intervention in Primary Care : A Systematic Review of Program-Level
Eva Chang1, Iridian Guzman1, Nicole Glowacki1
1Advocate Aurora Research Institute, Advocate Health, Milwaukee, Wisconsin (E.C., I.G., N.G., R.K.).
Background:
Health care systems are investing significant resources in social needs screening and intervention programs.
Purpose:
To understand characteristics contributing to implementation of social needs screening and intervention programs in primary care.
Data Sources:
CINAHL, Cochrane, Ovid, PubMed, and Scopus (January 2015 to April 2025).
Study Selection:
U.S.-based programs using structured tools to screen adult patients for at least 1 Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set measure (food insecurity, transportation, and housing insecurity) and addressing social needs in primary care settings.
Data Extraction:
Program characteristics; screening and intervention implementation processes; and patient screening, intervention, clinical, and health care use outcomes.
Data Synthesis:
The review included 23 studies. Seventeen reported on screening outcomes, 11 in populations characterized by a particular condition or health care use and 6 in the general population. Programs with the highest percentage of patients screened focused on fewer than 500 patients with a particular condition or health care use and received support from additional staff or volunteers (4 of 17 studies). Of patients screened, 10.1% to 100% reported a social need. Eleven studies reported on receipt of assistance or resources, with a higher percentage of patients receiving assistance or resources among programs that targeted a smaller population. Few studies reported clinical and health care use outcomes, with mixed findings.
Limitations:
Few studies had complete reporting of screening and intervention rates and outcomes. Program characteristics and other screening and intervention processes varied across and within studies.
Conclusion:
Social needs programs focused on smaller, targeted populations were more likely to screen and assist a higher percentage of patients. Programs with adequate staffing may also screen a higher proportion of patients. However, evidence is mixed, particularly for clinical and health care use outcomes. Considerable differences among screening and intervention programs preclude simple suggestions for universal implementation.
Primary Funding Source:
Live Well Intramural Pilot Grant Program. (PROSPERO: CRD42023431151).
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
01:30Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
01:30Primary Healthcare Services
In 1978, international leaders convened in Alma-Ata, Kazakhstan, for what would be a pivotal event in global health. The Alma-Ata Declaration was the first to call...
01:30Preventive Healthcare Services
01:26Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is...
01:26Levels of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention
In primary prevention, actions taken before disease onset prevent the disease from...
01:29Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions