Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 11, 2026

A Novel Digital Platform for a Monitored Home-based Cardiac Rehabilitation Program
Published on: April 19, 2019
Disease Management and Healthcare Utilization in Limited English Proficiency Patients with Cardiovascular Disease
Zara Latif1, Shahzad Hassan2, Alexander Chaitoff3
1Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. Zlatif@mgh.harvard.edu.
Insights
Language preference did not affect cardiovascular disease (CVD) management in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) or heart failure (HF). This study found no significant differences in risk factor control or healthcare use between limited English proficient (LEP) and English-speaking individuals.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Public Health
- Health Disparities
Background:
- Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is highly prevalent, yet data on management for limited English proficient (LEP) patients are scarce.
- Understanding CVD risk factor control, disease management, and healthcare utilization in LEP populations is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate CVD risk factor control, disease management, and healthcare utilization in LEP patients compared to English-speaking patients.
- To identify disparities in care based on language preference.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database (2011-2020).
- Comparison of medication use, symptom burden, healthcare utilization, and CVD risk factors between LEP and English-speaking patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) or heart failure (HF).
- Multivariable modeling to assess significant differences between language groups.
Main Results:
- The study population represented 5.8 million adults with CAD or HF.
- LEP patients with HF showed higher rates of food insecurity and poverty but no differences in symptom burden, medication use, or healthcare utilization compared to English speakers.
- No significant differences in CVD risk factor control, symptom burden, medication use, or healthcare utilization were observed between LEP and English-speaking patients with CAD, though LEP patients had lower smoking rates.
Conclusions:
- Language preference did not appear to impact CVD risk factor control, symptom burden, medication use, or healthcare utilization in patients with CAD or HF.
- Further research is needed to explore access to care and CVD detection rates in LEP populations.
Background:
Despite the high prevalence of cardiovascular disease (CVD), data on CVD management and disease control among patients with limited English proficiency (LEP) are limited. In this study, we sought to understand CVD risk factor control, disease management, and healthcare utilization in LEP patients.
Methods:
We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database from 2011 to 2020 in LEP and English-speaking patients diagnosed with coronary artery disease (CAD) or heart failure (HF). We compared medication use, symptom burden, healthcare utilization, and CVD risk factors control based on language preference. We further assessed for significant differences between these groups using multivariable modeling.
Results:
Our weighted study population represented 5.8 million adults with CAD or HF. Among LEP patients with HF, 44% were female and 80% were Hispanic. LEP patients with HF had higher rates of food insecurity (p = 0.01) and poverty (p = 0.002) compared to English speakers. There were no significant differences in symptom burden, medication use, or healthcare utilization patterns among English speakers and LEP patients with HF. Among patients with CAD, there were no significant differences in cardiovascular risk factor control, symptom burden, medication use, or healthcare utilization based on language preference. Approximately, 25% of English-speaking patients with CAD were active smokers compared to 12% of LEP patients (p = 0.034).
Conclusions:
Among patients with CAD or HF, language preference did not impact CVD risk factor control, symptom burden, medication use, or healthcare utilization. Future studies exploring other aspects of care, such as access to care and rates of CVD detection in LEP populations, are still warranted.
Related Concept Videos
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Cardiomyopathy VI: Nursing Management
Rheumatic Heart Disease IV: Nursing Management
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Angina IV: Management
Atherosclerosis IV: Nursing Management