Invasive Coronary Physiology Assessment for Detecting Microcirculatory Dysfunction in Heart Transplant Recipients

Mateusz Sokolski1,2, Natalia Oliwia Bernacka3, Wiktoria Zychla3

  • 1Clinical Department of Heart Transplantation and Mechanical Circulatory Support, Department of Cardiac Surgery and Heart Transplantation, Institute of Heart Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.

Annals of Transplantation
|November 11, 2025
PubMed

Insights

Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) affects nearly a quarter of heart transplant recipients and is safely diagnosed using invasive coronary physiology assessment. CMD is linked to younger age, lower BMI, and chronotropic graft dysfunction post-transplant.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Transplantation Medicine
  • Vascular Physiology

Background:

  • Coronary vasculopathy is a significant late complication following heart transplantation (Htx).
  • Assessing coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is crucial for managing post-Htx patients.
  • Understanding CMD's association with recipient and donor characteristics is vital.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the safety and utility of invasive coronary physiology assessment in heart transplant recipients.
  • To determine the prevalence of coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) in this population.
  • To investigate the relationship between CMD and clinical factors in heart transplant recipients.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective assessment of coronary microcirculation using index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) and coronary flow reserve (CFR) during routine coronary angiography.
  • CMD was defined by IMR ≥25 or CFR <2.0.
  • Data collected from December 2020 to July 2023 on 33 heart transplant recipients.

Main Results:

  • Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) was diagnosed in 8 (24%) patients.
  • The assessment was safe and effective, with no reported complications.
  • CMD was more prevalent in younger patients (40±16 years) with lower BMI (22±4 kg/m²) and longer time since Htx (9.5 years).
  • Patients with CMD showed a higher incidence of pacemaker implantation (38%) compared to those without (4%).

Conclusions:

  • Invasive assessment of coronary physiology is a safe and effective method for diagnosing CMD in heart transplant recipients.
  • Nearly one-fourth of heart transplant recipients exhibit CMD.
  • CMD is associated with recipient age, time elapsed since transplantation, and chronotropic graft dysfunction.