Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 11, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancing Cancer Associated Thrombosis Research in Rodent Models
Published on: January 5, 2024
Evaluating Rivaroxaban for Thromboprophylaxis in Cancer Patients with Long-Term Venous Access Devices: A
1Department of Lung Cancer, Tianjin Lung Cancer Center, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, People's Republic of China.
Background:
Long-term venous access devices, including PICCs and implantable ports, increase the risk of catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) in cancer patients. The role of prophylactic rivaroxaban in this setting remains uncertain.
Methods:
We retrospectively analyzed adult cancer patients who underwent peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) or implantable port (PORT) placement between January 2019 and May 2023. CRT was diagnosed via B-ultrasound. To reduce surveillance bias, only patients who underwent ≥4 ultrasound examinations were included. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression were used to assess the effect of rivaroxaban prophylaxis and to explore subgroup differences.
Results:
Among 1,585 patients with upper-limb catheters, 822 met inclusion criteria, with 135 CRT events. The median time to CRT was 55 days (IQR: 29.5-121.5), and 66.2% occurred within 90 days post-catheterization. Prophylactic rivaroxaban significantly reduced CRT risk (HR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.33-0.67; p < 0.001), particularly in high-risk groups such as those with PICC lines or active tumors. No significant benefit was observed in patients with no-evidence-of-disease (NED) or those with cardiac stents, atrial fibrillation, or prior cerebral infarction. In the PORT subgroup, risk reduction was not statistically significant overall (HR = 0.66, p = 0.07), but became significant after excluding NED and cardiovascular conditions (HR = 0.52, p = 0.0195).
Conclusion:
Rivaroxaban prophylaxis reduces CRT in cancer patients with long term central venous catheters, particularly those with PICCs or active disease. Routine use appears unnecessary in NED or patients on antiplatelet therapy, highlighting the importance of individualized prophylaxis strategies.
Related Concept Videos
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis IV: Nursing Management
Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Anticoagulant Drugs: Vitamin K Antagonists and Direct Oral Anticoagulants
Warfarin, a prominent vitamin K antagonist family member, exerts its effect by inhibiting the enzyme VKORC1 (vitamin K epoxide reductase complex 1). By hindering this enzyme, warfarin...
Venous Thrombosis I: Introduction
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins

