Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

8.6K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
8.6K
Contaminants and Errors01:16

Contaminants and Errors

340
Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
340
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

9.5K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
9.5K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

14.3K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
14.3K
Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

1.5K
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
1.5K
Data Validation01:15

Data Validation

564
Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:
564

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evaluating a custom GPT assistant for critical appraisal of biological variation studies by the BIVAC.

Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine·2026
Same author

Impact of tobacco smoking on estimated telomere shortening and epigenetic age acceleration among human blood immune cell types.

Clinical epigenetics·2026
Same author

Decoding cellular stress states for toxicology using single-cell transcriptomics.

NAM journal·2026
Same author

Biological Variation of Natriuretic Peptides and Other Cardiovascular Disease-Related Biomarkers: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Clinical chemistry·2026
Same author

Decoding Cellular Stress States for Toxicology Using Single-Cell Transcriptomics.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Systematic review and meta-analysis of biological variation data of urine albumin, albumin to creatinine ratio and other markers in urine.

Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 11, 2026

Detection of Targetable Alterations in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer using Next-generation Sequencing
05:17

Detection of Targetable Alterations in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer using Next-generation Sequencing

Published on: October 10, 2025

325

An Overview of Allowable Total Error in the Clinical Laboratory.

Michelle R Campbell1, Kornelia Galior2

  • 1Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.

The Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine
|November 11, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Allowable total error (ATE) defines acceptable analytical performance for clinical laboratory assays. Understanding various resources and their limitations is crucial before setting ATE acceptance criteria.

More Related Videos

Comprehensive & Cost Effective Laboratory Monitoring of HIV/AIDS: an African Role Model
23:56

Comprehensive & Cost Effective Laboratory Monitoring of HIV/AIDS: an African Role Model

Published on: October 31, 2010

17.1K
Author Spotlight: Microbial Control and Monitoring Strategies for Cleanroom Environments and Cellular Therapies
09:30

Author Spotlight: Microbial Control and Monitoring Strategies for Cleanroom Environments and Cellular Therapies

Published on: March 17, 2023

4.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 11, 2026

Detection of Targetable Alterations in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer using Next-generation Sequencing
05:17

Detection of Targetable Alterations in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer using Next-generation Sequencing

Published on: October 10, 2025

325
Comprehensive & Cost Effective Laboratory Monitoring of HIV/AIDS: an African Role Model
23:56

Comprehensive & Cost Effective Laboratory Monitoring of HIV/AIDS: an African Role Model

Published on: October 31, 2010

17.1K
Author Spotlight: Microbial Control and Monitoring Strategies for Cleanroom Environments and Cellular Therapies
09:30

Author Spotlight: Microbial Control and Monitoring Strategies for Cleanroom Environments and Cellular Therapies

Published on: March 17, 2023

4.4K

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Laboratory Science
  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Quality Management in Healthcare

Background:

  • Allowable total error (ATE) is a critical quality metric for clinical laboratory assays, ensuring acceptable analytical performance.
  • ATE limits vary based on the specific assay, testing context, and clinical application.
  • ATE is routinely used in clinical laboratories for method evaluation, quality control troubleshooting, and instrument comparison.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and describe various resources for defining allowable total error (ATE) limits in clinical laboratory assays.
  • To discuss the strengths and weaknesses associated with different approaches to setting ATE.
  • To inform users about the variability in ATE magnitude resulting from different definition methods.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of resources for setting allowable total error (ATE).
  • Analysis of approaches including clinical outcomes, biological variation, state-of-the-art, professional guidelines, and regulatory requirements.
  • Discussion of the strengths and limitations of each resource.

Main Results:

  • No universal standards exist for defining maximum allowable error.
  • Multiple resources (clinical outcomes, biological variation, state-of-the-art, professional organizations, regulatory bodies) can be used to set ATE.
  • Each resource yields different ATE magnitudes for the same assay.

Conclusions:

  • Users must be aware of the diverse resources available for setting ATE.
  • Understanding the limitations of each resource is essential before establishing acceptance criteria for laboratory assays.
  • Informed selection of ATE resources ensures appropriate analytical performance standards.