Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 11, 2026

Author Spotlight: A Multi-Depth Porcine Model for Comprehensive Study of Burn Injuries and Healing Processes
Published on: February 23, 2024
Use of selective decontamination of the digestive tract in burn patients: A European survey
Emma Atsuko Tsuchiya1, Mette Krag1, Morten Hylander Møller2
1Department of Anesthesiology, Surgery and Trauma Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Inge Lehmanns Vej 6, Section 6011, Copenhagen Ø DK-2100, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, Copenhagen N DK-2200, Denmark.
Background:
Infectious complications are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in burn patients. Selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) is a prophylactic antimicrobial strategy aimed at suppressing potential pathogenic microorganisms in the gut microbiome. This study aimed to assess the values and preferences for the use of SDD in burn centres across Europe and to evaluate clinicians' interest in further research on its efficacy.
Methods:
We circulated a survey on the values and preferences for the use of SDD between March and October 2024, targeting surgeons, anaesthesiologists, and intensivists at European burn centres. The survey comprised 13 questions focusing on SDD usage criteria, regimens, and willingness to participate in a multicentre randomised clinical trial. Data were analysed and presented descriptively.
Results:
We invited 45 burn centres to participate; 22 responded (49 % response rate). Among these, 27 % (6/22) reported routine use of SDD, primarily for patients with extensive burns or those requiring intensive care. Most centres using SDD (5/6) administered a combination of enteral and intravenous antibiotics and/or antifungals, while one centre (1/6) relied on enteral antimicrobials alone. The most common regimen included intravenous cefotaxime combined with enteral polymyxin E, tobramycin, and amphotericin B or nystatin. Notably, 82 % (18/22) of respondents expressed interest in participating in a multicentre randomised clinical trial on SDD in burn patients.
Conclusion:
A minority of European burn centres routinely used SDD, while the majority did not. Among those that used SDD, treatment regimens were largely aligned with practices commonly used in ICU patients. Notably, there was significant interest among European burn centres in participating in future clinical trials comparing SDD versus no SDD in burn patients.
More Related Videos
07:22A Standardized Procedure of Dressing Management for Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis
Published on: March 14, 2025
04:01Indocyanine Green-Guided Intraoperative Imaging to Facilitate Video-Assisted Retroperitoneal Debridement for Treating Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis
Published on: September 8, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Prevention of Further Absorption of Poison
Burn Injuries
The damage results in the death of skin cells, which can lead to a massive loss of fluid. Dehydration, electrolyte imbalance, and renal and circulatory failure follow, which can be fatal. Burn patients are treated with intravenous fluids to offset...
What is Monogastric Digestion?
Drugs for Peptic Ulcer Disease: Sucralfate as Mucosal Protective Agents
In this scenario, mucosal protective agents like sucralfate play an essential role. Sucralfate, a complex of sulfated sucrose and aluminum hydroxide, demonstrates its usefulness in acidic conditions,...