Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Genetic Drift03:33

Genetic Drift

42.8K
Natural selection—probably the most well-known evolutionary mechanism—increases the prevalence of traits that enhance survival and reproduction. However, evolution does not merely propagate favorable traits, nor does it always benefit populations.
42.8K
Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift01:09

Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift

61.7K
In a population that is not at Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, the frequency of alleles changes over time. Therefore, any deviations from the five conditions of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium can alter the genetic variation of a given population. Conditions that change the genetic variability of a population include mutations, natural selection, non-random mating, gene flow, and genetic drift (small population size).
61.7K
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?02:05

Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?

7.9K
The genomes of eukaryotes are punctuated by long stretches of sequence which do not code for proteins or RNAs. Although some of these regions do contain crucial regulatory sequences, the vast majority of this DNA serves no known function. Typically, these regions of the genome are the ones in which the fastest change, in evolutionary terms, is observed, because there is typically little to no selection pressure acting on these regions to preserve their sequences.
In contrast, regions which code...
7.9K
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?02:05

Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?

3.4K
3.4K
Gene Duplication and Divergence02:37

Gene Duplication and Divergence

7.8K
The seminal work of Ohno in 1970 popularized the idea of gene duplication and divergence. DNA sequence comparison studies reveal that a large portion of the genes in bacteria, archaebacteria, and eukaryotes was  generated by gene duplication and divergence, indicating its critical role in evolution.
The duplicated copies of the gene are called Paralogs. Paralogs with similar sequences and functions form a gene family. Across several species, a large number of gene families are...
7.8K
Genome Size and the Evolution of New Genes03:21

Genome Size and the Evolution of New Genes

9.0K
While every living organism has a genome of some kind (be it RNA, or DNA), there is considerable variation in the sizes of these blueprints. One major factor that impacts genome size is whether the organism is prokaryotic or eukaryotic. In prokaryotes, the genome contains little to no non-coding sequence, such that genes are tightly clustered in groups or operons sequentially along the chromosome. Conversely, the genes in eukaryotes are punctuated by long stretches of non-coding sequence.
9.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Origins of allostery in vertebrate hemoglobin evolution.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Long-term evolution of regulatory DNA sequences. Part 1: simulations on global, biophysically-realistic genotype-phenotype maps.

Current opinion in genetics & development·2026
Same author

The structure of an ancient genotype-phenotype map shaped the functional evolution of a protein family.

Nature ecology & evolution·2025
Same author

Robustness of Ancestral Sequence Reconstruction to Among-site and Among-lineage Evolutionary Heterogeneity.

Molecular biology and evolution·2025
Same author

The structure of an ancient genotype-phenotype map shaped the functional evolution of a protein family.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Symmetry facilitated the evolution of heterospecificity and high-order stoichiometry in vertebrate hemoglobin.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same journal

Temporal trajectories underlying adult neuronal diversity.

Current opinion in genetics & development·2026
Same journal

Transcription regulation of cell fate plasticity - from embryonic development to tissue regeneration.

Current opinion in genetics & development·2026
Same journal

Shared molecular and cellular programs during regeneration of glandular epithelia.

Current opinion in genetics & development·2026
Same journal

Lineage tracing in human cortical development.

Current opinion in genetics & development·2026
Same journal

Cis-regulatory strategies in developmental patterning.

Current opinion in genetics & development·2026
Same journal

GABAergic neuron fate specification and lineage allocation: from development to disorder.

Current opinion in genetics & development·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 11, 2026

Optimization of Synthetic Proteins: Identification of Interpositional Dependencies Indicating Structurally and/or Functionally Linked Residues
07:08

Optimization of Synthetic Proteins: Identification of Interpositional Dependencies Indicating Structurally and/or Functionally Linked Residues

Published on: July 14, 2015

7.7K

Epistatic drift in protein evolution.

Ricardo Muñiz-Trejo1, Jaeda Ej Patton2, Santiago Herrera-Álvarez3

  • 1Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago, Chicago, USA.

Current Opinion in Genetics & Development
|November 12, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

New research shows that specific epistasis, or pairwise interactions, significantly impacts protein evolution. These interactions create lineage-specific patterns, challenging existing evolutionary theories.

More Related Videos

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations
04:52

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Published on: February 3, 2023

1.3K
Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions
06:50

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions

Published on: January 26, 2024

2.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 11, 2026

Optimization of Synthetic Proteins: Identification of Interpositional Dependencies Indicating Structurally and/or Functionally Linked Residues
07:08

Optimization of Synthetic Proteins: Identification of Interpositional Dependencies Indicating Structurally and/or Functionally Linked Residues

Published on: July 14, 2015

7.7K
Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations
04:52

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Published on: February 3, 2023

1.3K
Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions
06:50

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions

Published on: January 26, 2024

2.5K

Area of Science:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Evolutionary Biology
  • Biophysics

Background:

  • Protein sequence variation is mainly driven by context-independent amino acid effects and global biophysical nonlinearities.
  • Specific epistasis, particularly pairwise interactions, plays a crucial but often underestimated role in protein evolution.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the character and evolutionary impact of epistatic interactions within proteins.
  • To understand how these interactions influence protein sequence and biochemical property divergence over time.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing new methods to analyze epistatic interactions in proteins.
  • Examining how substitutions affect subsequent mutation effects and evolutionary trajectories.

Main Results:

  • Specific epistasis collectively has a major impact on protein evolution, altering the effects of numerous potential mutations.
  • As protein homologs diverge, the constraints on mutations shift, influencing adaptation and innovation.
  • Protein evolution outcomes are contingent on the specific substitutions occurring within a lineage due to epistatic architecture.

Conclusions:

  • The interplay of chance and epistatic architecture explains lineage-specific conservation and variation patterns.
  • This challenges dominant theories in molecular evolution that do not fully account for specific epistasis.
  • Epistatic interactions are key to understanding the contingency and diversity of protein evolution.