Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 11, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
Published on: August 29, 2025
Development and Validation of the Surrogate Decision-Maker Trust Scale.
Caleb Armstrong1,2, Kevin Gosselin3
1Parkland Health, Medical Intensive Care Unit, Dallas, TX, USA caleb.armstrong@unthsc.edu.
Researchers developed the Surrogate Decision-Maker Trust Scale (SDMTS) to measure trust in healthcare professionals. This validated scale is crucial for improving outcomes for patients in intensive care units.
Area of Science:
- Healthcare research
- Psychometrics
- Clinical nursing
Background:
- Surrogate decision-maker trust is vital for patient outcomes in adult intensive care units.
- No validated instrument currently exists to measure this trust.
- Developing a reliable scale is essential for clinical practice and research.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate the Surrogate Decision-Maker Trust Scale (SDMTS).
- To provide initial psychometric support for the SDMTS.
- To establish a tool for measuring surrogate trust in healthcare professionals.
Main Methods:
- Quantitative cross-sectional survey development design.
- Item generation through literature review and expert content validity evaluation.
- Exploratory factor analysis for construct validity and Cronbach's alpha for reliability.
Main Results:
- The final 22-item SDMTS demonstrated a three-factor structure explaining 48.4% of variance.
- The scale achieved a high Cronbach's alpha of .947, indicating excellent internal consistency.
- Initial validity and reliability were supported by the findings.
Conclusions:
- The SDMTS is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring surrogate decision-maker trust.
- Further validation through confirmatory factor analysis in diverse populations is recommended.
- The SDMTS can be used to assess and potentially improve patient care in intensive care settings.
Related Concept Videos
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Self-Report Tests of Personality
Reliability and Validity
Strategies of Self-Presentation III: Self-Monitoring
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model

