Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 11, 2026

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education
Published on: June 21, 2010
Enhancing continuing nursing education: a participatory action research approach in Iran
Hojat Mohsen1, Karimyar Jahromi Mahdi2
1Jahrom University of Medical Sciences, Jahrom, Iran.
Background:
Continuing nursing education is a crucial tool for advancing the nursing profession. Numerous studies have highlighted the suboptimal quality of continuing education programs. The purpose of this study was to identify the problems in continuing nursing education and develop solutions and implement them through active stakeholder engagement.
Methods:
The Kemmis and Mactaggart action research model was implemented at Jahrom University of Medical Sciences in Iran from 2017 to 2020. For the quantitative part of the study, convenience sampling was employed, with a total of 200 participants, including 126 nurses, 44 head nurses, and 30 nursing trainers. For the qualitative part of the study, purposive sampling was used, with a total of 114 participants. Participants engaged in one cycle of reflection, and data were collected and analyzed using both qualitative and quantitative methods. Qualitative data were gathered from 14 semi-structured interviews and 10 focus group discussions. A Satisfaction Questionnaire and Quality Assessment of Continuing Nursing Education were utilized. Special techniques such as Train The Trainer, education booster doses, and evaluating outcomes (clinical indicators) of education were used during the action phase. Data analysis was performed using MAXQDA software version 8 and SPSS software version 16.
Results:
The initial qualitative analysis during the assessment phase identified three overarching themes: planning challenges, implementing challenges, and evaluation challenges. Similarly, the final phase revealed three refined themes: planning in recovery, fixed implementation, and improving the evaluation. The total average satisfaction score of participants in continuous nursing education programs significantly improved after the actions (Before action: 19.66 ± 3.96, during action: 27.12 ± 3.64, one month after action: 23.74 ± 3.7, P < 0.001). The total quality score of continuous education programs also increased significantly post-action (Before action: 97.55 ± 23.1, after action: 197.29 ± 13.55, P < 0.001).
Clinical Trial Number:
N/A.
More Related Videos
14:43A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
08:10Neuroimaging Field Methods Using Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy NIRS Neuroimaging to Study Global Child Development: Rural Sub-Saharan Africa
Published on: February 2, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching II: Planning and Implementation
Nursing Implementation
The five steps to implementing effective nursing care include reassessing the patient, reviewing and revising the existing nursing care plan, organizing the resources and care delivery, anticipating and preventing complications, and implementing nursing interventions.
International Nursing Organizations II
The WHO provides expert team support, including funding, vaccines, testing, and treatment tools at the country level to fight...
International Nursing Organizations I
ICN member organizations work to advance the field of nursing and healthcare via policies, partnerships, lobbying, professional...
Nursing Evaluation