Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 11, 2026

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
Published on: January 11, 2020
A Temporal Validation Study of Diagnostic Prediction Models for the Screening of Elevated Low-Density and
Wuttipat Kiratipaisarl1, Vithawat Surawattanasakul1,2, Wachiranun Sirikul1,2,3
1Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, 110 Intrawarorot Road, Si Phum Subdistrict, Mueang Chiang Mai District, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.
Abstract:
Background/Objectives: Limited accessibility to hypercholesterolemia diagnosis hinders the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Therefore, we conducted a prospective, temporal validation study of two diagnostic prediction models, targeting endpoints of elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C, ≥160 mg/dL) and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C, ≥160 mg/dL). Methods: We prospectively recruited workers aged 20-40 years from a single-center, university hospital from March to June 2024 (n = 1099). We determined two diagnostic endpoints: elevated LDL-C and non-HDL-C. The predicted probabilities were derived from the binary logistic regression based on gender, metabolic age, and diastolic blood pressure. We assessed three prediction performances: discrimination from area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AuROC); calibration slope (C-slope) and calibration-in-the-large (CITL) from the calibration plot; clinical net benefit from decision curve analysis. Recalibration was based on C-slope and CITL, with a socioeconomic subgroup fairness assessment of AuROC, C-slope, and CITL. Results: From 1099 eligible participants, we identified 135 (12.3%) elevated LDL-C and 251 (22.8%) elevated non-HDL-C cases. The LDL-C model had poor discrimination (AuROC 0.59; 95%-CI, 0.56-0.62), miscalibration (C-slope 0.64; 95%-CI, 0.39-0.88 and CITL -0.14; 95%-CI, -0.27--0.02), and negligible investigation reduction. The non-HDL-C model had fair discrimination (AuROC 0.67; 95%-CI, 0.64-0.69), miscalibration (C-slope 0.71; 95%-CI, 0.59-0.83 and CITL -0.07; 95%-CI, -0.17-0.03), and 20% investigation reduction at prevalence threshold probability. Updated model fairness improved compared to the original models. Conclusions: Temporal validation demonstrated modest replicability for the elevated non-HDL-C model, with a potential limitation in participants with normal BMI but low muscle and high fat mass. Health practitioners may use updated elevated non-HDL-C models as a non-invasive triage strategy in young adults, with threshold probabilities within the positive clinical net benefit ranges. Further external validation studies in a larger and more diverse population are necessary.
More Related Videos
07:31Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
06:16Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
Sensitivity is the...
Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot