Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 11, 2026

Permanent Cerebral Vessel Occlusion via Double Ligature and Transection
Published on: July 21, 2013
Downstream Occlusion During Mechanical Thrombectomy: Clinical Implications and Endovascular Trajectory
Jang-Hyun Baek1, Hyo Suk Nam2, Young Dae Kim2
1Department of Neurology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 03181, Republic of Korea.
Insights
Downstream occlusion (DOC) during mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for large vessel occlusion (LVO) affects 36.1% of patients but does not compromise final outcomes. Additional endovascular treatment can effectively manage DOC, emphasizing the need for complete reperfusion.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Interventional Neuroradiology
- Vascular Surgery
Background:
- Downstream occlusion (DOC) is a frequent complication during mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute large vessel occlusion (LVO).
- The prevalence, predictors, and clinical impact of DOC remain incompletely understood.
- Understanding DOC is crucial for optimizing MT procedures and patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the prevalence and independent predictors of DOC in patients undergoing MT for intracranial LVO.
- To analyze the endovascular trajectory and clinical outcomes of patients with and without DOC.
- To evaluate the effectiveness of subsequent recanalization attempts in managing DOC.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 703 patients undergoing MT for acute intracranial LVO (2010-2021).
- Angiographic identification of DOC as a new occlusion distal to the primary site post-recanalization.
- Multivariate logistic regression for predictor analysis; comparison of outcomes between DOC and non-DOC groups.
Main Results:
- DOC occurred in 36.1% of patients, with atrial fibrillation and proximal occlusion as independent predictors.
- Patients with DOC showed comparable final successful recanalization (92.5%) and functional independence (40.2%) rates.
- Additional endovascular treatment for DOC improved reperfusion in 76.7% of cases, with variable functional benefit based on location.
Conclusions:
- DOC, despite procedural complexity, does not significantly impair final recanalization or functional outcomes.
- Effective management of DOC is achievable with further endovascular intervention.
- Attaining sufficient final reperfusion remains paramount in MT, even in the presence of DOC.
Abstract:
Background/Objectives: Downstream occlusion (DOC) is a commonly observed, yet frequently overlooked, angiographic event during mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute large vessel occlusion (LVO). This phenomenon has the potential to complicate procedures and influence outcomes. However, its prevalence, predictors, and endovascular trajectories remain poorly understood. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 703 patients who underwent MT for acute intracranial LVO between 2010 and 2021 at a tertiary stroke center was conducted. DOC was angiographically identified as a newly developed occlusion in a downstream artery following recanalization of the primary occlusion. Multivariate logistic regression was employed to analyze the clinical and procedural predictors of DOC. Endovascular and clinical outcomes were compared between patients with and without DOC. The DOC trajectory, including immediate reperfusion status, subsequent recanalization attempts, and final outcomes, was analyzed based on the occlusion location. Results: DOC was identified in 254 patients (36.1%). Atrial fibrillation and proximal occlusion were independently associated with DOC. Despite DOC adversely affecting endovascular procedural details, patients with DOC demonstrated comparable rates of final successful recanalization (92.5% vs. 91.3%; p = 0.577) and 90-day functional independence (40.2% vs. 46.3%; p = 0.114). Notably, about half of the patients exhibited an immediate modified Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) grade 2b at the time of DOC. Further recanalization attempts were undertaken in 67.7% of DOC cases, resulting in enhanced mTICI grades in 76.7% of cases and achieving final successful recanalization in 94.2% of cases. The functional advantages of additional recanalization attempts varied depending on DOC location but were generally limited. Conclusions: Despite its procedural complexity, DOC did not significantly compromise final recanalization or functional outcomes. Many cases were effectively managed with additional endovascular treatment, highlighting the importance of achieving sufficient final recanalization.
Related Concept Videos
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis I: Introduction

