Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 18, 2026
A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
A Pilot Study on a Reliable and Accessible Approach to Remote Mental Health Assessment: Lessons from Italian Pregnant
Chiara Colliva1, Veronica Rivi2, Pierfrancesco Sarti1
1Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41125 Modena, Italy.
Objective: This pilot study assessed the psychological and physical impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on postpartum women that gave birth during the pandemic, and evaluated the feasibility of remote monitoring for maternal mental health. The study also proposes a conceptual framework to strengthen remote maternal care in future public health emergencies. Methods: Conducted between 2020 and 2021 in Reggio Emilia, one of Italy's ten hardest-hit provinces during the early COVID-19 outbreak, this study enrolled 21 pregnant women (10 COVID-19-positive at delivery, 11 COVID-19-negative controls). Psychological and physical health were assessed using validated instruments: the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) for depression, the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) for anxiety, the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) for trauma-related stress, and the SF-36 for physical functioning. Additional measures included breastfeeding experience and resilience. Remote assessments were conducted between 6 and 12 months postpartum to evaluate psychological recovery and satisfaction with perinatal care. C test was used to compare the two groups of women. Results: COVID-19-positive women reported significantly higher depressive symptoms (BDI: 13.50 ± 8.14 vs. 6.73 ± 4.73; U = 27, p = 0.048), and elevated state anxiety levels (STAI-S: 41.60 ± 10.23 vs. 33.64 ± 10.15; U = 27, p = 0.048) compared to controls. Post-traumatic stress symptoms were also higher among COVID-positive participants (IES-R total: 41.10 ± 19.33 vs. 30.64 ± 7.99; U = 24.5, p = 0.029). No significant differences emerged in EPDS or trait anxiety scores. Conclusions: Remote data collection proved feasible for postpartum women during the pandemic and highlighted elevated depressive, anxiety, and trauma-related symptoms in COVID-19-positive mothers. These findings support the development of flexible digital care frameworks for maternal well-being in crises. The introduction of the "10 Gold Rules for Remote Maternal Healthcare in Critical Situations" offers a forward-looking, expert-informed conceptual framework to guide the development of scalable, trust-based digital care models that go beyond monitoring to include proactive, patient-centred support.
Objective: This pilot study assessed the psychological and physical impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on postpartum women that gave birth during the pandemic, and evaluated the feasibility of remote monitoring for maternal mental health. The study also proposes a conceptual framework to strengthen remote maternal care in future public health emergencies. Methods: Conducted between 2020 and 2021 in Reggio Emilia, one of Italy's ten hardest-hit provinces during the early COVID-19 outbreak, this study enrolled 21 pregnant women (10 COVID-19-positive at delivery, 11 COVID-19-negative controls). Psychological and physical health were assessed using validated instruments: the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) for depression, the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) for anxiety, the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) for trauma-related stress, and the SF-36 for physical functioning. Additional measures included breastfeeding experience and resilience. Remote assessments were conducted between 6 and 12 months postpartum to evaluate psychological recovery and satisfaction with perinatal care. C test was used to compare the two groups of women. Results: COVID-19-positive women reported significantly higher depressive symptoms (BDI: 13.50 ± 8.14 vs. 6.73 ± 4.73; U = 27, p = 0.048), and elevated state anxiety levels (STAI-S: 41.60 ± 10.23 vs. 33.64 ± 10.15; U = 27, p = 0.048) compared to controls. Post-traumatic stress symptoms were also higher among COVID-positive participants (IES-R total: 41.10 ± 19.33 vs. 30.64 ± 7.99; U = 24.5, p = 0.029). No significant differences emerged in EPDS or trait anxiety scores. Conclusions: Remote data collection proved feasible for postpartum women during the pandemic and highlighted elevated depressive, anxiety, and trauma-related symptoms in COVID-19-positive mothers. These findings support the development of flexible digital care frameworks for maternal well-being in crises. The introduction of the "10 Gold Rules for Remote Maternal Healthcare in Critical Situations" offers a forward-looking, expert-informed conceptual framework to guide the development of scalable, trust-based digital care models that go beyond monitoring to include proactive, patient-centred support.
More Related Videos
07:31Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
06:39Using a Murine Model of Psychosocial Stress in Pregnancy as a Translationally Relevant Paradigm for Psychiatric Disorders in Mothers and Infants
Published on: June 13, 2021
