Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Structure-Property Relationships in Streptomycin Sulfate-Incorporated Bioactive Glass/Chitosan Composite Scaffold: Physicochemical and Antibacterial Insights.

Polymers·2026
Same author

Electrical, Optical, and Anti-Microbial Behavior of Copper Nitrates-Doped Chitosan.

Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Sustainable one-part geopolymeric hybrid composite derived from glauconite, talc, and olive seed waste-based activated carbon for Congo red adsorption.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Economic Design of a Novel Magnetic ZnO-Doped Biocomposite: An Integrated Advanced Ionic Theory and Statistical Physics Approach for Cr(VI) and Hg(II) Remediation.

Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Pluronic F127-functionalized cerium fluoride nanocomposite: synthesis, characterization, and its enhanced antibacterial activities.

Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology·2026
Same author

Advancements in CO<sub>2</sub> Capture and Storage: Technologies, Performance, and Strategic Pathways to Net-Zero by 2050.

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 11, 2026

Fabrication of Carbon-Based Ionic Electromechanically Active Soft Actuators
14:42

Fabrication of Carbon-Based Ionic Electromechanically Active Soft Actuators

Published on: April 25, 2020

8.7K

Influence of Fabric Support on Improving the Layer-by-Layer Polyethersulfone Membrane Performance.

Ahmed A Bhran1, Abdelrahman G Gadallah1, Eman S Mansor2

  • 1Chemical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh 11432, Saudi Arabia.

Polymers
|November 13, 2025
PubMed
Summary

This study evaluated support materials for reverse osmosis (RO) membranes. Polyester woven supports yielded high permeate flux, while non-woven supports achieved superior salt rejection and mechanical strength.

Keywords:
fabric supportmembranenon-wovenpolyesterpolypropylenewoven

More Related Videos

Synthesis of Hydrogels with Antifouling Properties As Membranes for Water Purification
07:32

Synthesis of Hydrogels with Antifouling Properties As Membranes for Water Purification

Published on: April 7, 2017

9.9K
Preparation of Light-responsive Membranes by a Combined Surface Grafting and Postmodification Process
12:00

Preparation of Light-responsive Membranes by a Combined Surface Grafting and Postmodification Process

Published on: March 21, 2014

12.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 11, 2026

Fabrication of Carbon-Based Ionic Electromechanically Active Soft Actuators
14:42

Fabrication of Carbon-Based Ionic Electromechanically Active Soft Actuators

Published on: April 25, 2020

8.7K
Synthesis of Hydrogels with Antifouling Properties As Membranes for Water Purification
07:32

Synthesis of Hydrogels with Antifouling Properties As Membranes for Water Purification

Published on: April 7, 2017

9.9K
Preparation of Light-responsive Membranes by a Combined Surface Grafting and Postmodification Process
12:00

Preparation of Light-responsive Membranes by a Combined Surface Grafting and Postmodification Process

Published on: March 21, 2014

12.2K

Area of Science:

  • Materials Science
  • Chemical Engineering
  • Environmental Science

Background:

  • Reverse osmosis (RO) membranes are crucial for water purification.
  • The performance of RO membranes is significantly influenced by the support material used.
  • Optimizing support selection is key to enhancing membrane efficiency and durability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of various woven and non-woven support materials on reverse osmosis membrane performance.
  • To identify the optimal support material for enhanced permeate flux and salt rejection.
  • To evaluate the mechanical properties of membranes prepared with different supports.

Main Methods:

  • Preparation of reverse osmosis membranes using different support materials (polyester woven, polyester non-woven, polypropylene).
  • Characterization of membrane properties including permeate flux and salt rejection.
  • Assessment of the mechanical strength of the prepared membranes.

Main Results:

  • The membrane on polyester woven support (M1ws) achieved a permeate flux of 39.9 LMH using a piperazine coagulation bath.
  • The membrane on polyester non-woven support (M2ns) demonstrated the highest salt rejection of 92.2% with a Melamine coagulation bath.
  • Mechanical properties were ranked: M1ws > M2ns > M3np, with the polypropylene support (M3np) exhibiting the lowest mechanical properties.

Conclusions:

  • Support material selection critically affects RO membrane performance, including flux, rejection, and mechanical stability.
  • Polyester non-woven supports offer a promising balance of high salt rejection and good mechanical properties.
  • Further research into support material optimization can lead to more efficient and robust RO systems.