Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

1.3K
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.3K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

1.6K
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
1.6K
Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

1.5K
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
1.5K
One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation01:24

One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation

1.1K
This lesson introduces two critical methods in pharmacokinetics, the Wagner-Nelson and Loo-Riegelman methods, used for estimating the absorption rate constant (ka) for drugs administered via non-intravenous routes. The Wagner-Nelson method relates ka to the plasma concentration derived from the slope of a semilog percent unabsorbed time plot. However, it is limited to drugs with one-compartment kinetics and can be impacted by factors like gastrointestinal motility or enzymatic degradation.
On...
1.1K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

10.1K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
10.1K
Parameters Affecting Nonlinear Elimination: Zero-Order Input, First-Order Absorption and Two-Compartment Model01:13

Parameters Affecting Nonlinear Elimination: Zero-Order Input, First-Order Absorption and Two-Compartment Model

278
Drugs administered through various routes can lead to nonlinear elimination, resulting in complex pharmacokinetic behaviors crucial to understanding efficacious drug dosing.
When a drug is administered through a constant intravenous infusion and eliminated via nonlinear pharmacokinetics, it follows zero-order input. For example, oral drugs undergo first-order absorption upon administration and are eliminated through nonlinear pharmacokinetics.
In the case of subcutaneously administered drugs,...
278

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

PHENIX is not lonely on the road it walks: the opportunity once thought missed.

International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society·2026
Same author

CGRP mitigates myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury by attenuating ferroptosis through the inhibition of MAMs and mitochondrial division.

International immunopharmacology·2026
Same author

The oldest in situ <i>Homo erectus</i> crania in eastern Asia: The Yunxian site dates to ~1.77 Ma.

Science advances·2026
Same author

Intermolecular Cyclization of Alkyl Chains of Ketones for Constructing <i>ortho</i>-Diacylbenzenes.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2026
Same author

Impact of treatment modality on survival in FIGO stage IIB cervical cancer: a population-based propensity-score matched analysis.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Sentinel-Lymph-Node Biopsy Alone or with Lymphadenectomy in Cervical Cancer.

The New England journal of medicine·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 11, 2026

Author Spotlight: Unraveling the Pathogenesis of Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Discovering Potential Therapies
06:16

Author Spotlight: Unraveling the Pathogenesis of Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Discovering Potential Therapies

Published on: July 28, 2023

3.0K

Handling Multi-Source Uncertainty in Accelerated Degradation Through a Wiener-Based Robust Modeling Scheme.

Hua Tu1, Xiuli Wang2,3, Yang Li1

  • 1School of Mechatronic Engineering and Automation, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|November 13, 2025
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a robust Wiener process framework to improve accelerated lifetime modeling. The new method enhances prediction reliability by addressing degradation variability and external disturbances.

Keywords:
accelerated lifetime modelingheterogeneous degradation pathsinterval-based inferencerobust framework

More Related Videos

A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data
10:46

A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data

Published on: December 9, 2015

11.0K
Data Acquisition Protocol for Determining Embedded Sensitivity Functions
07:46

Data Acquisition Protocol for Determining Embedded Sensitivity Functions

Published on: April 20, 2016

6.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 11, 2026

Author Spotlight: Unraveling the Pathogenesis of Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Discovering Potential Therapies
06:16

Author Spotlight: Unraveling the Pathogenesis of Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Discovering Potential Therapies

Published on: July 28, 2023

3.0K
A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data
10:46

A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data

Published on: December 9, 2015

11.0K
Data Acquisition Protocol for Determining Embedded Sensitivity Functions
07:46

Data Acquisition Protocol for Determining Embedded Sensitivity Functions

Published on: April 20, 2016

6.5K

Area of Science:

  • Reliability Engineering
  • Materials Science
  • Statistical Modeling

Background:

  • Accelerated lifetime modeling faces challenges from complex degradation, limited data, and external factors.
  • Existing methods struggle with unit-to-unit variability and external perturbations, impacting prediction accuracy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a robust framework for accurate accelerated lifetime modeling and prediction.
  • To address challenges of heterogeneous degradation, limited samples, and external disturbances.

Main Methods:

  • A Wiener process-based framework incorporating random-effect structures for variability.
  • Interval-based inference to handle sampling limitations.
  • A hybrid estimator (Huber loss + Metropolis-Hastings) to mitigate external influences.
  • Quantitative stress-parameter linkage for transferring accelerated test data to normal conditions.

Main Results:

  • The framework provides more stable parameter inference compared to traditional methods.
  • Improved reliability in lifetime predictions was demonstrated.
  • Validation on connector stress relaxation data confirmed the methodology's effectiveness.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed Wiener process framework offers a robust solution for complex accelerated lifetime modeling.
  • This approach enhances the accuracy and reliability of predictions in engineering applications.
  • The methodology effectively handles unit variability and external disturbances for better lifetime forecasting.