Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 11, 2026

Tumor Treating Field Therapy in Combination with Bevacizumab for the Treatment of Recurrent Glioblastoma
Published on: October 27, 2014
Tocilizumab vs bevacizumab in critically ill COVID-19 patients: Registry-based prospective study
Yatendra Kumar Gupta1, Raghubir S Khedar2, Gulam Mateen Parihar1
1Department of Critical Care, Eternal Heart Care Centre & Research Institute, Eternal Hospital, Jaipur, India.
Background:
Tocilizumab, an interleukin-6 (IL-6) inhibitor, and bevacizumab, a vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor, have been used in critically ill COVID-19 patients for cytokine storm. We performed a registry-based prospective study to compare the efficacy of these two drugs.
Methods:
Virologically confirmed hospitalised patients with severe COVID-19 who received either tocilizumab or bevacizumab have been included. Management details and outcomes were recorded. The primary outcome was in-hospital deaths and secondary outcomes were 30-day deaths, changes in oxygen requirement at 48 h of drug administration and duration of intensive care unit stay. Descriptive statistics are reported.
Results:
One thousand three hundred forty-five COVID-19 patients were hospitalised during the study period, 87 with severe COVID-19 received tocilizumab (n = 62) or bevacizumab (n = 25). Patients in the tocilizumab group were older (62.6 ± 11 vs 53.2 ± 14, p = 0.001) with more cardiovascular disease and no significant differences in clinical features, laboratory investigations, or radiological and biochemical markers of disease severity. Oxygenation, ventilatory support and proning were similar as were supportive therapies (steroids, remdesivir, anticoagulants; p > 0.05). In-hospital deaths in tocilizumab vs bevacizumab group were 47 (75.8%) vs 12 (48.0%; p = 0.012) with unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.91 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.99-3.65, p = 0.050) and age-adjusted HR 1.76 (95% CI 0.90-3.44, p = 0.097). Secondary outcome of 30-day death was also more in tocilizumab group: 49 (79.0%) vs 13 (52.0%; p = 0.011). Within-group comparison showed that PaO2:FiO2 at 48-h of drug administration was better in bevacizumab group (p = 0.003) compared to tocilizumab (p = 0.651).
Conclusion:
VEGF inhibitor bevacizumab led to significantly better ventilatory outcomes and lower in-hospital and 30-day deaths compared to IL-6 inhibitor tocilizumab in severely ill COVID-19 patients. Randomised studies are required to confirm these findings.
More Related Videos
05:39Author Spotlight: A Non-Intubated Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery with Multimodal Analgesia and Sevoflurane Inhalation Anesthesia
Published on: May 26, 2023
10:38Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies
Published on: January 16, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Bioequivalence studies: Biowaivers
Acute Respiratory Failure-II
The underlying physiological abnormalities that contribute to hypoxemic respiratory failure include:
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Respiratory Failure-III