Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 11, 2026

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
Published on: January 11, 2020
Description of Pharmacist Interventions Based on Pharmaceutical Care and a Vulnerability Scoring Tool in a Tertiary
Justine Falanga-Duchesneau1, Gabrielle Plante2, Julie Racicot3
1, PharmD, was, at the time of this study, a Resident Pharmacist with the Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec, Université Laval, Québec, Quebec. She is now a Pharmacist with the same institution.
Background:
Following a restructuring of its pharmacy practices and activities, the pharmacy department of the Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec developed a patient prioritization tool to optimize its delivery of pharmaceutical care. This tool assigns a vulnerability score to patients according to their medications and certain vulnerability factors established in the literature. The tool identifies vulnerable patients who need pharmaceutical care on a mandatory basis (within 1 day) or a priority basis (between 1 and 3 days).
Objective:
To describe pharmacist interventions carried out for patients admitted to the study institution, in terms of pharmaceutical care provided in relation to scoring with the prioritization tool.
Methods:
This prospective study involved patients admitted to the study institution for at least 48 hours between May 10 and May 19, 2023. The prioritization tool was applied for all included patients, who were followed prospectively throughout their stay. The pharmacists recorded their interventions on a data collection form. Data were analyzed using frequency analysis, and relationships between variables were expressed using the Pearson correlation coefficients and percentages.
Results:
Of the 393 patients seen during the study period, 304 were included in the study. Of these, 186 had a priority designation and 64 had a mandatory designation, according to the prioritization tool. The pharmacists performed a total of 1023 interventions, with 194 of the 304 included patients receiving at least 1 pharmacist intervention. The number of interventions for each patient increased with the person's vulnerability score. The most frequent activities were chart review (n = 453, 44.3%), followed by the prescription (n = 115, 11.2%), dose adjustment (n = 64, 6.3%), and discontinuation (n = 64, 6.3%) of a medication. The mean response time was 1.25 days for patients deemed to need pharmaceutical care on a mandatory basis and 1.57 days for patients deemed to need care on a priority basis.
Conclusion:
In this study, the number of interventions per patient increased with the person's vulnerability score. Although pharmacists responded faster than the recommended time for patients deemed to need care on a priority basis, the response time for patients needing care on a mandatory basis could be improved.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Drug Dosing: Geriatric Patients
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Affecting Factors
Dosage Regimens: Partial Pharmacokinetic Parameters
Dosage Regimen: Individualization
Dosage Regimens: Designs and Approaches

