Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Diffuse Optical Spectroscopy for the Quantitative Assessment of Acute Ionizing Radiation Induced Skin Toxicity Using a Mouse Model
Published on: May 27, 2016
Position Statement on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Use in Evidence Synthesis Across Cochrane, the Campbell
Ella Flemyng1, Anna Noel-Storr1, Biljana Macura2,3
1Cochrane London UK.
None:
Evidence synthesists are ultimately responsible for their evidence synthesis, including the decision to use artificial intelligence (AI) and automation, and to ensure adherence to legal and ethical standards.Cochrane, the Campbell Collaboration, JBI, and the Collaboration for Environmental Evidence support the aims of the Responsible use of AI in evidence SynthEsis (RAISE) recommendations, which provide a framework for ensuring responsible use of AI and automation across all roles within the evidence synthesis ecosystem.Evidence synthesists developing and publishing syntheses with Cochrane, the Campbell Collaboration, JBI, and the Collaboration for Environmental Evidence can use AI and automation as long as they can demonstrate that it will not compromise the methodological rigor or integrity of their synthesis.AI and automation in evidence synthesis should be used with human oversight.Any use of AI or automation that makes or suggests judgements should be fully and transparently reported in the evidence synthesis report.AI tool developers should proactively ensure their AI systems or tools adhere to the RAISE recommendations so we have clear, transparent, and publicly available information to inform decisions about whether an AI system or tool could and should be used in evidence synthesis.
Related Concept Videos
Ethics in Research
The Evidence for Evolution
Non-equilibrium in the Cell
Current Trends in Nursing II
Ethics and Bioethics
Bias in Epidemiological Studies

