Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 11, 2026

Author Spotlight: Genetic Profiling for Fluorouracil Response in Gastric Cancer
Published on: May 10, 2024
Availability, Affordability, and Variations in Price of GI Cancer Medicines in Nepal
Ramila Shilpakar1, Brian Shkabari2, Bibek Acharya1
1Department of Clinical Oncology, National Academy of Medical Sciences, Bir Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Purpose:
Access to cancer medicines is a function of both availability and affordability. In Nepal, where patients are responsible for procuring and purchasing treatments out of pocket, access is limited by both unavailability of medicines and unaffordability of available medicines. This study aimed to examine the availability, affordability, and price variation of GI cancer medicines in Nepal's public cancer hospitals.
Methods:
A cross-sectional survey was conducted among four public cancer hospitals across Nepal between October 2022 and January 2023. Availability, affordability, and price variations of 26 therapeutic regimens for gastroesophageal, colorectal, hepatobiliary, and pancreatic cancers were examined. The maximum and minimum monthly retail prices of each individual available medicine and regimen were compared, and interhospital and intrahospital differences in price were calculated. Affordability was assessed by comparing monthly treatment costs with the monthly national per capita gross domestic product (GDP).
Results:
Fourteen of 26 (53.8%) regimens were available in at least one hospital, whereas nine (34.6%) were available in all four public cancer hospitals. We discovered differences as high as 422% in capecitabine pricing within the same hospital, and differences in irinotecan pricing of 997% across hospitals. With the exception of capecitabine monotherapy, and fluorouracil plus cisplatin, all of the remaining available GI cancer treatments have monthly prices that exceed the monthly per capita GDP of Nepal.
Conclusion:
GI cancer drug access in Nepal is limited by low availability and significant price variation. Intrahospital and interhospital price disparities may influence patients to seek out different prices across institutions to avoid financial toxicity, adding logistical burden. Price regulation, transparency, and local manufacturing are needed to improve equitable access to cancer medicines.
More Related Videos
10:28Gene Regulation and Targeted Therapy in Gastric Cancer Peritoneal Metastasis: Radiological Findings from Dual Energy CT and PET/CT
Published on: January 22, 2018
07:59Author Spotlight: Advancements in Molecular Biomarker Testing for Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Published on: September 8, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Stability-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence
Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonists
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
Pharmaceutical Equivalents