Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 11, 2026

Radiosynthesis, Quality Control, and Small Animal Positron Emission Tomography Imaging of 68Ga-Labelled Nano Molecules
Published on: October 4, 2024
Access to anticancer and orphan medicines through compassionate use programs and named patient basis in seven
N Rosenberg1, H C Post2, T Schutte3
1Medicine for Society, Platform at Amsterdam UMC - University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism (AGEM) Research Institute, Expertise Centre for Inborn Errors of Metabolism, MetabERN, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Background:
In the European Union (EU), anticancer and orphan medicines are often granted marketing authorization based on surrogate endpoints and limited clinical trial data. Driven by unmet medical needs and the urgency of providing access beyond clinical trials, there is growing interest in early access, such as compassionate use programs (CUPs) and named patient basis (NPB). Additionally, limited clinical evidence can hinder health technology assessments and, when combined with high costs, delay reimbursement negotiations and patient access. Hence, it is crucial to explore CUPs and NPBs including pricing and reimbursement aspects.
Design:
This study includes a policy analysis to evaluate CUPs and NPBs in seven high-income European countries (Belgium, France, Germany, Netherlands, Norway, Switzerland, and the UK). We collected data on regulatory characteristics, including reimbursement aspects, from national health authority resources and direct consultations. In an in-depth examination, we assessed CUPs of anticancer and orphan medicines authorized in 2021 and 2022, focusing on availability, duration, and geographic distribution.
Results:
Our analysis reveals variability in national regulations, with inconsistent reimbursement options for CUPs and NPBs. For NPBs, reimbursement was often unregulated. The in-depth examination of CUPs revealed disparities in availability and duration before and after EU marketing authorization. We identified 36 CUPs, with 3-9 CUPs per country. Each CUP was available in up to four countries.
Conclusion:
We recommend minimizing disparities between CUPs and NPBs across Europe to ensure equitable access for patients with high unmet medical needs. Reducing these differences is essential to protect patients from feeling compelled to travel abroad or bear the financial burden of obtaining medicines that are not authorized in their home country.
More Related Videos
11:14Anticancer Metal Complexes: Synthesis and Cytotoxicity Evaluation by the MTT Assay
Published on: November 10, 2013
07:40Preparation of Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cell Pellets and Plasma from a Single Blood Draw at Clinical Trial Sites for Biomarker Analysis
Published on: March 20, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Prescription, Nonprescription and Orphan Drugs
The misuse and addiction to prescription drugs is a growing problem that can affect people of all age groups, specifically teenagers. This can happen when prescription medications are used in ways not intended by the prescriber, such as taking someone else's prescription or using medication for...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Drug Products: Biologics, Biosimilars and Interchangeables
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...