Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 11, 2026

Tumor Treating Field Therapy in Combination with Bevacizumab for the Treatment of Recurrent Glioblastoma
Published on: October 27, 2014
Outcomes of Sequential Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Retreatment After Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab in Patients With
Takanori Ito1, Shigeo Shimose2, Issei Saeki3
1Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Background And Aim:
Data on sequential immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) retreatment following initial atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atez + Bev) are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sequential ICI retreatment in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC).
Methods:
Of 835 patients with uHCC treated with Atez + Bev, 75 who underwent ICI retreatment after initial Atez + Bev therapy were included in this multicenter retrospective study that assessed the efficacy and safety of ICIs.
Results:
The participants received one of three sequential retreatments with ICI regimens: durvalumab plus tremelimumab (n = 58), retreatment with Atez + Bev (n = 15), and durvalumab monotherapy (n = 2). The objective response rates (ORRs)/disease control rates (DCRs) for the initial Atez + Bev and sequential ICI retreatment were 34.7%/89.3% and 18.7%/54.7%, respectively. No significant differences in antitumor response were observed among the three ICI retreatment regimens. Patients who achieved a good antitumor response (≥ stable disease) following retreatment showed a significantly longer overall survival. Multivariate analysis identified prior objective response to Atez + Bev as an independent predictor of disease control after retreatment (odds ratio: 3.79, p = 0.016). Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) requiring corticosteroids occurred in 26.7% of the patients during ICI retreatment, with enterocolitis and rash being the most common. The recurrence rate of irAEs was 15.4% in patients with previous steroid-requiring irAEs.
Conclusions:
Sequential ICI retreatment may be a viable therapeutic option for selected patients with uHCC, particularly those with a favorable response to prior Atez + Bev. Although less effective than first-line therapy, careful patient selection and monitoring ensure efficacy with acceptable safety.
More Related Videos
06:38An Oncogenic Hepatocyte-Induced Orthotopic Mouse Model of Hepatocellular Cancer Arising in the Setting of Hepatic Inflammation and Fibrosis
Published on: September 12, 2019
09:11Y-90 Radioembolization and PD-1 Inhibitor as Neoadjuvant Treatment in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Published on: May 24, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Tumor Immunotherapy
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...