Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Pressure Relationships in Thoracic Cavity01:24

Pressure Relationships in Thoracic Cavity

5.8K
Breathing, otherwise known as pulmonary ventilation, is the process of air movement into and out of the lungs. The main mechanisms propelling pulmonary ventilation are atmospheric pressure (Patm), intra-pulmonary (Ppul ) or intra-alveolar pressure (Palv) within the alveoli, and intrapleural pressure (Pip) within the pleural cavity.
Breathing Mechanisms
Both intra-alveolar and intrapleural pressures rely on specific lung properties. The ability to breathe—allowing air to enter the lungs...
5.8K
Assessment of Ventilation II: Respiratory Depth and Rhythm01:29

Assessment of Ventilation II: Respiratory Depth and Rhythm

2.4K
Respiratory Depth
Respiratory depth measures the volume of air inhaled or exhaled during a breath. It can vary from shallow to deep and typically remains consistent when a person is at rest or asleep. Occasionally, individuals will automatically inhale deeply, known as sighing, which inflates the lungs with more air than normal breathing.
To assess respiratory depth, observe the degree of chest excursion or movement:
2.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effectiveness of Pressure Mapping in Preventing Pressure Injuries: A Systematic Review.

Advances in skin & wound care·2026
Same author

Artificial intelligence-enabled workflows in nursing and their impact on workload, emotional well-being, and workforce sustainability: A systematic review.

International journal of nursing studies·2026
Same author

The Interplay of Fatalism, Death Anxiety, and Treatment Compliance in Patients with Diabetes Who Have Undergone Amputation: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Advances in skin & wound care·2026
Same author

Modeling interprofessional collaboration: an instrumental case study of interprofessional co-facilitation in simulation-based team training.

Journal of interprofessional care·2026
Same author

Medication and Acute Care Use in Young Adults With Opioid Use Subject to Medicaid Prescription Caps.

JAMA health forum·2026
Same author

The iceberg of a healthy work environment: Understanding the spiral of incivility and silence in nursing and midwifery faculties - a qualitative study.

Nurse education today·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 11, 2026

Ex Vivo Porcine Experimental Model for Studying and Teaching Lung Mechanics
12:09

Ex Vivo Porcine Experimental Model for Studying and Teaching Lung Mechanics

Published on: April 19, 2024

2.0K

Comparative Pressure Mapping of Pediatric Support Surfaces.

Oleg Teleten1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8, Chrissie Smith1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8, Jonathon Holte1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8

  • 1Oleg Teleten, MS, RN, CWCN, Quality & Safety Department, Wound Care Team, UC Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA.

Journal of Wound, Ostomy, and Continence Nursing : Official Publication of the Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society
|November 14, 2025
PubMed
Summary

Static air-filled surfaces effectively reduce tissue interface pressures in children compared to standard hospital surfaces. This finding is crucial for preventing pressure injuries in pediatric patients.

Keywords:
Mattress overlayPediatricsPressure injuryPressure redistributionPressure ulcerSupport Surface

More Related Videos

Implementation of Non-invasive Point of Care Transient Elastography for Evaluation of Liver Disease in Pediatric Populations with Cystic Fibrosis
05:56

Implementation of Non-invasive Point of Care Transient Elastography for Evaluation of Liver Disease in Pediatric Populations with Cystic Fibrosis

Published on: August 29, 2025

422
Author Spotlight: Implications of Non-Nutritive Sucking on Speech Emergence and Infant Development
06:19

Author Spotlight: Implications of Non-Nutritive Sucking on Speech Emergence and Infant Development

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 11, 2026

Ex Vivo Porcine Experimental Model for Studying and Teaching Lung Mechanics
12:09

Ex Vivo Porcine Experimental Model for Studying and Teaching Lung Mechanics

Published on: April 19, 2024

2.0K
Implementation of Non-invasive Point of Care Transient Elastography for Evaluation of Liver Disease in Pediatric Populations with Cystic Fibrosis
05:56

Implementation of Non-invasive Point of Care Transient Elastography for Evaluation of Liver Disease in Pediatric Populations with Cystic Fibrosis

Published on: August 29, 2025

422
Author Spotlight: Implications of Non-Nutritive Sucking on Speech Emergence and Infant Development
06:19

Author Spotlight: Implications of Non-Nutritive Sucking on Speech Emergence and Infant Development

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.2K

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric medical devices
  • Biomedical engineering
  • Clinical research

Background:

  • Pressure redistributing surfaces are essential for preventing tissue damage.
  • Limited research exists on the effectiveness of these surfaces in pediatric populations.
  • Identifying optimal surfaces is critical for infant and child care.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the most effective pressure redistributing surface for children.
  • To compare the efficacy of static air-filled surfaces against standard hospital surfaces.

Main Methods:

  • A repeated measures design was employed, with each child serving as their own control.
  • 49 infants and children participated across two academic medical centers.
  • A pressure mapping system quantified interface pressures and surface areas.

Main Results:

  • Static air-filled surfaces demonstrated a lower mean pressure (10.41 mmHg) than regular surfaces (12.43 mmHg).
  • Peak pressures were significantly lower on static air surfaces (22.44 mmHg) compared to regular surfaces (34.92 mmHg).
  • Static air surfaces provided a larger contact area (140.1 sq inches) than regular surfaces (105.3 sq inches).

Conclusions:

  • Static air-filled surfaces significantly reduce tissue interface pressures in children.
  • These surfaces offer a promising solution for pressure injury prevention in pediatric care.
  • Further research may explore long-term outcomes and diverse pediatric populations.