Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 11, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Methods for Addressing Missingness in Electronic Health Record Data for Clinical Prediction Models: Comparative
Jean Digitale1,2, Deborah Franzon3, Mark J Pletcher2
1National Clinician Scholars Program, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Background:
Missing data are a common challenge in electronic health record (EHR)-based prediction modeling. Traditional imputation methods may not suit prediction or machine learning models, and real-world use requires workflows that are implementable for both model development and real-time prediction.
Objective:
We evaluated methods for handling missing data when using EHR data to build clinical prediction models for patients admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU).
Methods:
Using EHR data containing missing values from an academic medical center PICU, we generated a synthetic complete dataset. From this, we created 300 datasets with missing data under varying mechanisms and proportions of missingness for the outcomes of (1) successful extubation (binary) and (2) blood pressure (continuous). We assessed strategies to address missing data including simple methods (eg, last observation carried forward [LOCF]), complex methods (eg, random forest multiple imputation), and native support for missing values in outcome prediction models.
Results:
Across 886 patients and 1220 intubation events, 18.2% of original data were missing. LOCF had the lowest imputation error, followed by random forest imputation (average mean squared error [MSE] improvement over mean imputation: 0.41 [range: 0.30, 0.50] and 0.33 [0.21, 0.43], respectively). LOCF generally outperformed other imputation methods across outcome metrics and models (mean improvement: 1.28% [range: -0.07%, 7.2%]). Imputation methods showed more performance variability for the binary outcome (balanced accuracy coefficient of variation: 0.042) than the continuous outcome (mean squared error coefficient of variation: 0.001).
Conclusions:
Traditional imputation methods for inferential statistics, such as multiple imputation, may not be optimal for prediction models. The amount of missingness influenced performance more than the missingness mechanism. In datasets with frequent measurements, LOCF and native support for missing values in machine learning models offer reasonable performance for handling missingness at minimal computational cost in predictive analyses.
Related Concept Videos
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis
Methods of Documentation VII: EMR
Kaplan-Meier Approach
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Analysis Methods of Pharmacokinetic Data: Model and Model-Independent Approaches
The model approach uses mathematical models to describe changes in drug concentration over time. Pharmacokinetic models help characterize drug behavior in patients, predict drug concentration in the body fluids, calculate optimum dosage regimens, and evaluate the risk of toxicity. However, ensuring that the model fits the experimental data accurately...

