Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 11, 2026

Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
Prognostic Performance of a Modified HFA-ICOS Tool for Prediction of Cardiovascular Complications in Cancer Patients
Mari Nordbø Gynnild1, Victoria Vinje-Jakobsen2, Joris Holtrop3
1K.G. Jebsen Center for Cardiac Biomarkers, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Clinic of Cardiology, St. Olavs University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway; Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, NTNU - Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway; Stroke Unit, Clinic of Medicine, St. Olavs University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Background:
The 2022 European Society of Cardiology Cardio-oncology Guidelines recommend the Heart Failure Association and International Cardio-Oncology Society risk stratification tool to predict cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in cancer patients. Developed from expert consensus rather than mathematical derivation, its quantitative prognostic value in unselected cancer populations remains uncertain.
Objectives:
The objective of the study was to assess the prognostic utility of a modified Heart Failure Association and International Cardio-Oncology Society tool, excluding biomarkers and imaging, in predicting CVD complications in cancer patients, thereby providing a quantitative correlate to an expert consensus-based method.
Methods:
We included 2,290 cancer patients from the third follow-up of the Trøndelag Health study, diagnosed within 4 years of participation, and followed through 2023. Cancer therapy details were obtained from the Norwegian Cancer Registry. The primary outcome was a composite of myocardial infarction, heart failure hospitalization, stroke, or CVD mortality, identified via national registries.
Results:
The mean age was 65.8 years; 48% were female. The most common cancers were gastrointestinal (23%), prostate (19%), and breast (12%). The median follow-up was 6.9 years. The modified tool classified 28% as low-, 35% moderate-, 34% high-, and 3% very high-risk. CVD incidence rose across categories: 7%, 21%, 29%, and 37% (P < 0.001). The C-statistic was 0.696 (95% CI: 0.674-0.718), and 0.746 (95% CI: 0.676-0.812) among anthracycline-treated patients. Within the low-to-moderate group, event rates ranged from 6% to 8% (0-1 points) to 24% to 27% (3-4 points).
Conclusions:
The tool stratifies CVD risk in cancer patients and may guide tailored follow-up and cardioprotection. Heterogeneity within moderate-risk patients highlights the need for refinement to improve individualized assessment.
More Related Videos
06:46Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
07:32Author Spotlight: Investigating Immune Cell Dynamics in the Tumor Microenvironment — Challenges and Innovations in Cancer Prognosis
Published on: April 12, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial...