Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 11, 2026
05:28
Author Spotlight: Enhancing Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Stroke Patients Through Advanced Robotic and Neuromodulation Technologies
Published on: October 11, 2024
1.1K
Motor learning principles reported in stroke trials of upper limb task-oriented training: a scoping review.
Subramanian Durairaj1, Sanjukta Sardesai1, John M Solomon2,3
1Department of Physiotherapy, Manipal College of Health Professions, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
BMJ Open
|November 14, 2025
Summary
Reporting of practice conditions in upper limb task-oriented training (UL-TOT) for stroke recovery varied. While variability, dosage, and complexity were consistently reported, feedback and distribution details were inconsistent, hindering replication.
Area of Science:
- Neurorehabilitation
- Motor Learning
- Clinical Trial Methodology
Background:
- Upper limb task-oriented training (UL-TOT) is crucial for stroke motor recovery.
- The Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) guidelines emphasize detailed reporting of complex interventions.
- Inconsistent reporting of UL-TOT components can impede study replication and intervention effectiveness.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the extent of reporting for practice conditions related to motor learning principles in UL-TOT stroke clinical trials.
- To identify which motor learning principles are consistently and inconsistently reported in UL-TOT research.
Main Methods:
- A systematic literature search was conducted across major databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane) from 2000 to 2024.
- Two independent reviewers screened titles, abstracts, and full texts based on predefined inclusion/exclusion criteria.
- A third reviewer resolved any discrepancies during the screening process to ensure accuracy.
Main Results:
- Out of 23,802 retrieved studies, 166 met the inclusion criteria.
- Practice conditions like variability (98%), dosage (97%), and movement complexity (96%) were frequently reported.
- Reporting of task selection (75%), challenging/progressive practice (76%), order (57%), distribution (51%), and feedback (type 44%, timing 44%, frequency 37%) varied significantly.
Conclusions:
- Key practice conditions (variability, dosage, complexity, task selection) are reported consistently in UL-TOT stroke trials.
- Reporting of practice distribution, order, and feedback characteristics remains inconsistent.
- A standardized checklist for motor learning-based practice conditions is recommended to enhance reporting fidelity and facilitate intervention replication in future stroke rehabilitation research.
