Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 11, 2026

Upper-extremity Approach for Secondary Access in Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
Published on: August 8, 2025
Long-Term Impact of Mild Paravalvular Regurgitation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: The OCEAN-TAVI
Yusuke Watanabe1, Masanori Yamamoto2, Hirofumi Hioki3
1Department of Cardiology, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/Yusukeewatanab.
Background:
The clinical significance of mild paravalvular regurgitation (PVR) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remains uncertain.
Objectives:
The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of mild PVR on long-term clinical outcomes and bioprosthetic valve failure (BVF) following TAVR.
Methods:
A total of 5,068 patients from the OCEAN-TAVI (Optimized Catheter Valvular Intervention-Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation; UMIN000020423) registry who underwent TAVR and had no or trace or mild PVR at discharge were analyzed. Patients were stratified according to PVR severity and followed for up to 9 years. The primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and BVF, defined according to Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 criteria.
Results:
Median follow-up duration was 4.7 years (Q1-Q3: 2.9-6.0 years). Mild PVR was observed in 1,601 patients (31.6%). At 9-year follow-up, Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated a significantly higher cumulative incidence of all-cause mortality (75.9% [95% CI: 71.3%-80.2%] vs 72.2% [95% CI: 68.1%-76.3%]; log-rank P = 0.014) and BVF (20.7% [95% CI: 12.8%-32.5%] vs 17.3% [95% CI: 11.0%-26.6%]; P = 0.029) in patients with mild PVR than in those with no or trace PVR. Fine-Gray analysis confirmed mild PVR as an independent predictor of BVF (subdistribution HR [sHR]: 1.48; 95% CI: 1.07-2.04; P = 0.018), and Cox regression showed a significant association with all-cause mortality (HR: 1.11; 95% CI: 1.02-1.21; P = 0.014). The risk for BVF was especially elevated in patients receiving balloon-expandable valves (sHR: 1.46; 95% CI: 1.02-2.08; P = 0.038), those undergoing nontransfemoral TAVR (sHR: 5.58; 95% CI: 1.57-19.9; P = 0.0086), and those with impaired renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2; sHR: 3.86; 95% CI: 1.30-11.5; P = 0.015). Baseline mild PVR was independently associated with an increased risk for progression to moderate or greater PVR (HR: 3.74; 95% CI: 2.84-4.92; P < 0.001).
Conclusions:
Mild PVR after TAVR is associated with a significantly increased risk for BVF and all-cause mortality, highlighting the importance of optimizing valve deployment and monitoring patients with even mild PVR.
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation IV: Nursing Management
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management

