Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Infection01:20

Infection

11.7K
When a pathogen enters the body and reproduces, it can cause an infection, damage body cells, and cause illness symptoms that eventually lead to disease. Therefore, its prevention requires breaking the chain of infection.
The chain begins with pathogens: bacteria, viruses, fungi, prions, or parasites such as protozoa helminths. These can be present on the skin as transient or resident flora, or they can be acquired from the environment. Identifying and treating the type of infection and...
11.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pertussis Outbreak in Extended Family With Severe Infant Outcomes: Impact of Vaccine Hesitancy.

Journal of paediatrics and child health·2026
Same author

Cremation and the medical practitioner.

The Medical journal of Australia·2023
Same author

Between the sea and the sky: A social practice investigation into health behaviours during cruise travel.

Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals·2022
Same author

Lead poisoning outbreak from consumption of contaminated Ayurvedic medication.

The Medical journal of Australia·2022
Same author

Mumps outbreak in a rugby league team despite pre-existing immunity.

The Medical journal of Australia·2020
Same journal

Australasian chronic lymphocytic leukaemia consensus statement: 2026 update.

Internal medicine journal·2026
Same journal

The paradox of peer review: protecting science or policing thought?

Internal medicine journal·2026
Same journal

Immune-related pancytopenia in pregnancy.

Internal medicine journal·2026
Same journal

Crossover effect: causal machine learning reveals opposing mortality responses to mean arterial pressure targets among phenotypically distinct hypertensive patients with septic shock.

Internal medicine journal·2026
Same journal

Clinicopathological findings, correlations and outcomes in patients with renal disease and living with antiretroviral-treated human immunodeficiency virus infection.

Internal medicine journal·2026
Same journal

Approach to thyroid disorders associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Internal medicine journal·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 11, 2026

Replication of the Ordered, Nonredundant Library of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain PA14 Transposon Insertion Mutants
11:35

Replication of the Ordered, Nonredundant Library of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain PA14 Transposon Insertion Mutants

Published on: May 4, 2018

8.6K

Do pathogens lurk in library books?

Mark J Ferson1,2

  • 1Public Health Unit, South Eastern Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Internal Medicine Journal
|November 17, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Concerns about library books spreading disease emerged in the 19th century. Despite investigations and public health measures, no evidence indicates library users or staff are at risk from infections via books.

Keywords:
booksdisease transmissionfumigationlibrariespandemic responsepublic health legislation

More Related Videos

Safety Precautions and Operating Procedures in an ABSL-4 Laboratory: 2. General Practices
08:53

Safety Precautions and Operating Procedures in an ABSL-4 Laboratory: 2. General Practices

Published on: October 3, 2016

18.9K
Identification of Rare Bacterial Pathogens by 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing and MALDI-TOF MS
06:34

Identification of Rare Bacterial Pathogens by 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing and MALDI-TOF MS

Published on: July 11, 2016

19.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 11, 2026

Replication of the Ordered, Nonredundant Library of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain PA14 Transposon Insertion Mutants
11:35

Replication of the Ordered, Nonredundant Library of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain PA14 Transposon Insertion Mutants

Published on: May 4, 2018

8.6K
Safety Precautions and Operating Procedures in an ABSL-4 Laboratory: 2. General Practices
08:53

Safety Precautions and Operating Procedures in an ABSL-4 Laboratory: 2. General Practices

Published on: October 3, 2016

18.9K
Identification of Rare Bacterial Pathogens by 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing and MALDI-TOF MS
06:34

Identification of Rare Bacterial Pathogens by 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing and MALDI-TOF MS

Published on: July 11, 2016

19.8K

Area of Science:

  • Library Science
  • Infectious Disease Epidemiology
  • Public Health History

Background:

  • The late 19th century saw the discovery of pathogenic bacteria, prompting concerns about disease transmission through library books.
  • Microbiological studies confirmed low levels of bacteria on books used by infected individuals.
  • Public health legislation in the UK and Australia/New Zealand restricted library book returns from infected households.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate historical concerns and scientific evidence regarding the potential for library books to transmit infectious diseases.
  • To assess the risk to library users and staff, particularly during pandemics.

Main Methods:

  • Historical review of public health legislation and library practices related to infectious disease control.
  • Summary of microbiological investigations into bacterial presence on library books.

Main Results:

  • Bacteria were found at low levels on books from infected households.
  • Library hygiene practices, such as formaldehyde fumigation, were implemented but likely ineffective.
  • Despite recurring concerns during pandemics, no evidence supports transmission of infections from library books to users or staff.

Conclusions:

  • Historical concerns about library books spreading disease are not supported by scientific evidence.
  • Library users and staff are not considered to be at risk of acquiring infections from books.
  • Pandemic-related anxieties regarding fomite transmission from books are unfounded.