Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

HARMONY: A large-scale harmonized neuroimaging dataset for research on anxious misery disorders.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Assessing visual and refractive outcomes of subretinal fluid detected by handheld swept-source optical coherence tomography in full-term newborns.

Journal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus·2026
Same author

The Clinical and Surgical Landscape of Gender Affirming Vocal Care: A Scoping Review.

Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology·2026
Same author

Genetic and Pathogenic Differentiation of <i>Fusarium oxysporum</i> Isolates from Ginger.

Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Preterm Optic Disc Morphology on Handheld OCT and 5-Year Visual Outcomes.

Ophthalmology science·2026
Same author

Rationale for Preservative-free Glaucoma Drops.

International ophthalmology clinics·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 11, 2026

Morphometric Analyses of Retinal Sections
14:33

Morphometric Analyses of Retinal Sections

Published on: February 19, 2012

10.7K

Quantitative Analysis of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Using SPECTRALIS Glaucoma Module Premium Edition and

Daniel X Chen1,2, Kayen Tang1, Leona Ding1

  • 1Department of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Translational Vision Science & Technology
|November 17, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The SPECTRALIS Glaucoma Module Premium Edition (GMPE) and Standard Glaucoma Module (SGM) show high correlation in retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness measurements. However, significant differences exist, requiring clinical consideration for glaucoma management.

More Related Videos

Using Retinal Imaging to Study Dementia
09:17

Using Retinal Imaging to Study Dementia

Published on: November 6, 2017

22.2K
Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential
07:11

Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential

Published on: May 25, 2020

6.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 11, 2026

Morphometric Analyses of Retinal Sections
14:33

Morphometric Analyses of Retinal Sections

Published on: February 19, 2012

10.7K
Using Retinal Imaging to Study Dementia
09:17

Using Retinal Imaging to Study Dementia

Published on: November 6, 2017

22.2K
Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential
07:11

Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential

Published on: May 25, 2020

6.8K

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Glaucoma Research

Background:

  • Accurate measurement of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness is crucial for diagnosing and monitoring glaucoma.
  • The SPECTRALIS optical coherence tomography (OCT) platform offers different glaucoma modules for RNFL analysis.
  • Understanding the comparability of these modules is essential for consistent patient management.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the relationship and agreement between RNFL thickness measurements obtained from the SPECTRALIS Glaucoma Module Premium Edition (GMPE) and the SPECTRALIS Standard Glaucoma Module (SGM).

Main Methods:

  • A cross-sectional study involving glaucoma and glaucoma suspect patients.
  • Peripapillary RNFL thickness was measured using both GMPE and SGM on the same day.
  • Scans with good centration and reliable segmentation were analyzed from 766 eyes.

Main Results:

  • High correlation (r ≥ 0.844, ICC ≥ 0.706) was found between GMPE and SGM RNFL thickness measurements.
  • Significant differences in global and most sectoral RNFL thicknesses were observed (P < 0.001).
  • A global systematic difference of 3.31 µm was noted, with 31.2% of eyes showing >5 µm difference.

Conclusions:

  • Despite strong correlation, significant and sometimes marked differences in RNFL thickness exist between GMPE and SGM.
  • Clinicians must consider these discrepancies when interpreting measurements or switching between modules for glaucoma patient management.