Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 11, 2026

In Vivo Multimodal Imaging and Analysis of Mouse Laser-Induced Choroidal Neovascularization Model
Published on: January 21, 2018
Automated measurement of macular neovascularization lesion size in nAMD using AI segmentation
Anna Vahldiek1, Lukas Heine2, Benja Vahldiek2
1Institute for AI in Medicine, University Medicine Essen, Essen, North-Rhine Westfalia, Germany. anna.vahldiek@uk-essen.de.
Purpose:
To compare artificial intelligence (AI)-based annotations of hyperreflective material (HRM) and manual demarcation of macular neovascularization (MNV) on optical coherence tomography (OCT) volume scans in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), and to assess the suitability of AI-driven OCT segmentation for longitudinal lesion monitoring.
Methods:
In this retrospective study, 42 eyes from 36 patients (21 f, 15 m; mean age baseline 76.6 y) with exudative nAMD were analyzed using longitudinal spectral-domain OCT data. Manual MNV demarcations on en-face OCT projections served as ground truth and were compared to AI-predicted HRM segmentations generated by a 3D nU-Net model on OCT scans. HRM and MNV lesion areas were quantified at multiple time points, and agreement between manual and AI-based measurements was evaluated using Pearson correlation, ordinary least squares regression and robust regression.
Results:
A highly similar mean lesion growth was observed when comparing HRM/MNV lesion sizes in longitudinal measurements. Point-by-point comparison revealed a strong overall correlation (r = 0.78) between AI-predicted and manually annotated HRM areas with increasing significance with longer follow-up. However, two aspects were responsible for some AI measurements being larger than manual measurements: At baseline, AI measurements included hyperreflective subretinal fluid as HRM, which was resorbed after three anti-VEGF injections, and during longer-term follow-up, manually annotated MNV areas were occasionally smaller than those derived from AI-based HRM segmentation due to the manual underestimation of very thin HRM.
Conclusions:
AI-based segmentation of HRM on OCT scans demonstrates strong overall agreement with manual MNV measurements, particularly on longitudinal assessments. Despite some AI-based overestimations occurring at baseline and some manual MNV underestimations during follow-up, measurements between both methods were highly comparable over time.
More Related Videos
08:54Author Spotlight: Understanding Age-Related Macular Degeneration Pathophysiology with QAF Workflow
Published on: May 26, 2023
05:14Author Spotlight: Overcoming Anti-VEGF Resistance Through Advanced Vascular Morphology Assessment in Choroidal Neovascularization
Published on: August 11, 2023