Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Echo01:06

Echo

869
The human ear cannot distinguish between two sources of sound if they happen to reach within a specific time interval, typically 0.1 seconds apart. More than this, and they are perceived as separate sources.
Imagine the sound is reflected back to the ears. Assuming that the source is very close to the human, the difference between hearing the two sounds—the emitted sound and the reflected sound—may be more than the minimum time for perceiving distinct sounds. If this is the case,...
869

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Towards Dependent Race Models for the Stop-Signal Paradigm: The Copula Approach.

Computational brain & behavior·2026
Same author

Measuring Multisensory Integration in Reaction Time: Relative Entropy Approach.

Multisensory research·2025
Same author

Terms of debate: Consensus definitions to guide the scientific discourse on visual distraction.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2024
Same author

A two-stage diffusion modeling approach to the compelled-response task.

Psychological review·2021
Same author

A consensus guide to capturing the ability to inhibit actions and impulsive behaviors in the stop-signal task.

eLife·2019
Same author

Paradox resolved: Stop signal race model with negative dependence.

Psychological review·2018

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 11, 2026

A Method for Tracking the Time Evolution of Steady-State Evoked Potentials
12:03

A Method for Tracking the Time Evolution of Steady-State Evoked Potentials

Published on: May 25, 2019

8.9K

Predicting the sound-induced flash illusion: A time-window-of-integration approach.

Hans Colonius1, Adele Diederich2

  • 1Department of Psychology, Carl von Ossietzky Universitat Oldenburg.

Psychological Review
|November 17, 2025
PubMed
Summary

The sound-induced flash illusion (SIFI) occurs when one flash and two sounds create a perception of two flashes. A new model explains how temporal integration windows influence SIFI susceptibility, especially in hearing aid users.

More Related Videos

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

11.4K
Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills
09:27

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills

Published on: January 19, 2024

1.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 11, 2026

A Method for Tracking the Time Evolution of Steady-State Evoked Potentials
12:03

A Method for Tracking the Time Evolution of Steady-State Evoked Potentials

Published on: May 25, 2019

8.9K
A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

11.4K
Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills
09:27

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills

Published on: January 19, 2024

1.7K

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Auditory Perception

Background:

  • The sound-induced flash illusion (SIFI) is a perceptual phenomenon where one flash paired with two sounds leads to the illusory perception of two flashes.
  • Factors influencing SIFI include stimulus parameters, participant expectations, attention, age, and clinical status.
  • Existing models for SIFI are limited, hindering a comprehensive understanding of its underlying mechanisms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a formal computational model, the "time-window-of-integration for SIFI" (TWIS), to explain SIFI.
  • To investigate SIFI differences between elderly hearing aid users and non-users with similar hearing loss.
  • To explore the role of temporal integration windows and reporting bias in SIFI.

Main Methods:

  • Development of the TWIS model based on temporal binding window principles.
  • Experimental study comparing SIFI in elderly hearing aid users and non-users.
  • Analysis of SIFI incidence and reporting bias in relation to hearing aid use and hearing loss.

Main Results:

  • The TWIS model successfully predicts SIFI occurrence based on temporal and physical stimulus arrangements.
  • Hearing aid users exhibited a higher incidence of SIFI compared to non-users.
  • This increased SIFI in hearing aid users was attributed to a larger temporal integration window and a greater bias to report the illusion.

Conclusions:

  • The TWIS model provides a mechanism for understanding how stimulus variations affect SIFI.
  • The findings suggest that hearing aid use can modulate SIFI through altered temporal processing and decision-making biases.
  • The model complements existing Bayesian causal inference explanations, aiding the interpretation of diverse SIFI findings across populations.