Sociotechnical imaginaries of autonomous vehicles: Comparing laboratory and online eye-tracking methods
- Mergime Ibrahimi 1,2, Anu Masso 1,2, Mauro Bellone 1
- Mergime Ibrahimi 1,2, Anu Masso 1,2, Mauro Bellone 1
- 1FinEst Centre for Smart Cities, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia.
- 2Ragnar Nurkse Department of Innovation and Governance, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn Estonia.
- 0FinEst Centre for Smart Cities, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
View abstract on PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.This study used eye-tracking to explore how people envision autonomous vehicles (AVs). Global participants focused more on AVs, while lab participants prioritized human decision-making in non-AV scenarios.
Area Of Science
- Human-Computer Interaction
- Sociotechnical Systems
- Cognitive Science
Background
- Sociotechnical imaginaries shape public perception of emerging technologies like autonomous vehicles (AVs).
- Understanding cognitive engagement with AVs is crucial for their development and integration.
- Previous research often lacks diverse perspectives on human-AV interaction.
Purpose Of The Study
- To investigate sociotechnical imaginaries of AVs using a dual eye-tracking approach.
- To examine variations in cognitive engagement with AVs across different decision-making scenarios.
- To compare in-lab and online methodologies for studying human perception of AVs.
Main Methods
- Employed a dual approach: in-lab and online eye-tracking experiments.
- Presented participants with hypothetical decision-making scenarios involving AV algorithmic failure.
- Analyzed gaze durations and overall cognitive engagement patterns.
Main Results
- Both in-lab and online participants showed longer gaze durations in AV scenarios.
- In-lab participants focused more on non-AV scenarios, emphasizing human decision-making.
- Online participants showed increased attention to AV scenarios, reflecting diverse global perspectives.
Conclusions
- Perception of AVs and concerns about algorithmic decision-making vary globally.
- Eye-tracking reveals differences in cognitive engagement based on sample diversity and sociotechnical imaginaries.
- The study highlights the complementary value of in-lab and online methods for understanding emerging technologies.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.

