Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 2, 2026

Behavioral Assessment of Manual Dexterity in Non-Human Primates
Published on: November 11, 2011
Intra-observer and inter-observer repeatability of two slowness tests: Moberg picking-up and Twelve-ball tests
Nazanin Abolhassani1,2, Sarah Fustinoni3, Yves Henchoz3
1Department of Epidemiology and Health Systems, Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Route de la Corniche 10, Lausanne, 1010, Switzerland. nazanin.abolhassani@unibe.ch.
Background:
Slowness plays a crucial role in geriatric assessments and is closely linked to frailty. In an attempt to propose alternatives to gait speed, the Moberg picking-up test (MPUT) was proposed for measuring slowness in older adults. Concurrently, we developed the Twelve-ball test (TBT) as a novel and simplified alternative to the MPUT. This study aimed to assess and compare the intra-observer and inter-observer repeatability of the MPUT and TBT in a large sample of community dwelling older adults.
Methods:
This study used data from the population-based Lausanne cohort 65+. In 2020, 596 individuals, aged 81-86 years, completed two sets of MPUT or TBT measurements. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to examine intra-observer (two-way mixed-effects model) and inter-observer (one-way random-effects model) relative repeatability of both measurements for either the MPUT or TBT. Absolute repeatability was determined by the standard error of measurement (SEM). Bland-Altman plots were plotted for visual representation of heteroscedasticity. Subgroup analyses were conducted per gender, education, and speed.
Results:
For the MPUT, intra-observer repeatability was ICC = 0.77 (95% CI 0.65 to 0.84) and SEM = 1.76, while inter-observer repeatability was ICC = 0.74 (95% CI 0.66 to 0.80) and SEM = 1.23. For the TBT, intra-observer repeatability was ICC = 0.89 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.93) and SEM = 0.91, while inter-observer repeatability was ICC = 0.84 (95% CI 0.78 to 0.89) and SEM = 0.91. In all subgroup analyses, the TBT exhibited higher intra-observer and inter-observer repeatability compared to the MPUT.
Conclusions:
The MPUT and TBT appear reliable in terms of intra- and inter-observer repeatability. However, the assessments of repeatability, considering both relative and absolute consistency, show stronger results in the TBT compared to the MPUT test. With its simplified application, the TBT proves to be a promising measure of slowness in older adults.
More Related Videos
07:18A Behavioral Test Battery for the Repeated Assessment of Motor Skills, Mood, and Cognition in Mice
Published on: March 2, 2019
08:40Isokinetic Robotic Device to Improve Test-Retest and Inter-Rater Reliability for Stretch Reflex Measurements in Stroke Patients with Spasticity
Published on: June 12, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Naturalistic Observations
Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test
McNemar's Test