Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 11, 2026

Experimental Column Setup for Studying Anaerobic Biogeochemical Interactions Between Iron OxyHydroxides, Trace Elements, and Bacteria
Published on: December 19, 2017
Interplay of Fe and S biogeochemistry shapes in situ iron mineral transformations in contrasting intertidal sediments
L Joëlle Kubeneck1,2, Giulia Fantappiè1, Luiza Notini1,3
1Soil Chemistry Group, Institute of Biogeochemistry and Pollutant Dynamics, Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zürich, Universitätstrasse 16, CHN, Zürich, CH-8092, Switzerland. joelle.kubeneck@ru.nl.
Abstract:
The transformation and stability of iron (Fe) minerals in coastal sediments are closely linked to the sulfur (S) cycle, influencing the fate of nutrients, carbon, and contaminants. However, in situ studies of these interactions in coastal sediments remain limited. We investigated the transformation of lepidocrocite, goethite, and mackinawite in three intertidal field plots with contrasting Fe and S biogeochemistry. Fe minerals were enriched with 57Fe and mixed with the sediment, allowing close contact with the other inorganic and organic components of the sediment. After 8 weeks, transformation products were assessed using 57Fe Mössbauer spectroscopy. Regular porewater analysis complemented solid-phase analyses, supporting the understanding of transformation pathways and extents. Under low-sulfide, Fe-reducing conditions, lepidocrocite did not transform to more crystalline Fe-oxides such as goethite or magnetite. Instead, ∼20% of the lepidocrocite transformed, mostly into a disordered Fe-phase, due to reductive dissolution and a small extent of sulfidation. Goethite, in contrast, remained apparently unchanged under the same conditions. These results indicate that both Fe-oxides may persist during extended anoxic periods under Fe-reducing conditions in coastal sediments and thus may influence elemental cycles. However, in sulfidic environments, lepidocrocite and goethite transformed into amorphous, nonstoichiometric Fe-sulfide and greigite. We hypothesize that amorphous Fe-sulfide precipitated first, later transforming into greigite; a potential precursor of pyrite formation. This is further supported by the transformation of synthetic mackinawite into greigite under high sulfide conditions, suggesting a sulfidation pathway that may eventually lead to pyrite formation in coastal sediments.
More Related Videos
09:45Laboratory Simulation of an IronII-rich Precambrian Marine Upwelling System to Explore the Growth of Photosynthetic Bacteria
Published on: July 24, 2016
09:31Preparation of Authigenic Pyrite from Methane-bearing Sediments for In Situ Sulfur Isotope Analysis Using SIMS
Published on: August 31, 2017
Related Concept Videos
The Sulfur Cycle
What are Biogeochemical Cycles?
Microbial Nutrition
Metabolism of Chemolithotrophs
Formation of Complex Ions
Precipitation and Co-precipitation