Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 11, 2026

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
Published on: August 30, 2013
Optimization of microcalcification cluster detection in wide-angle flying focal spot digital breast tomosynthesis and
Katrien Houbrechts1, Astrid Van Camp1, Lesley Cockmartin2
1Department of Imaging and Pathology, Division of Medical Physics, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Purpose:
To investigate the impact of angular range and dose distribution on microcalcification cluster detection in digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and synthetic mammography (SM) of a clinical wide-angle DBT system with flying focal spot (FFS), through virtual imaging techniques.
Approach:
DBT projection sets were acquired from ten patients at twice the automatic exposure controlled (AEC) dose. Noise was added to each projection to create four projection sets: (1) 25 projections at AEC dose ("AEC"), (2) 25 projections with a convex dose distribution ("convex"), (3) 25 projections with increased dose in the central three projections ("peak 3"), and (4) 19 projections covering a 40° angular range instead of the standard 50° ("40 degrees"). Total scan dose and angular spacing were maintained constant across all setups. Microcalcification clusters were simulated within these projection sets, followed by a human observer detection study with DBT and SM patches. Performance was analysed using jackknife-alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic (JAFROC) analysis.
Results:
For DBT, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.89 ± 0.03 (AEC), 0.91 ± 0.03 (convex), 0.88 ± 0.03 (peak 3), and 0.91 ± 0.04 (40 degrees). For SM, AUC values were lower: 0.73 ± 0.04, 0.74 ± 0.02, 0.73 ± 0.04, and 0.74 ± 0.02, respectively. No significant improvements were observed compared to the AEC setup for either modality.
Conclusions:
Increasing the dose to the central projections or reducing the angular range from 50° to 40° did not significantly affect calcification detection in DBT or SM compared to the standard AEC setup for an FFS system.
More Related Videos
10:25Author Spotlight: Integrating High-Resolution Intravital Imaging and MRI to Enhance Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Planning
Published on: April 12, 2024
13:43Intraductal Delivery and X-ray Visualization of Ethanol-Based Ablative Solution for Prevention and Local Treatment of Breast Cancer in Mouse Models
Published on: April 1, 2022