Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 11, 2026

Author Spotlight: Efficient Image Recognition Using Directional Gradient Histogram Technique and Support Vector Machines
Published on: January 5, 2024
A comparative machine and deep learning approach for predicting ultimate bearing capacity of shallow foundations in
1Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Port Said University, Port Said, Egypt. mahmoud.mohamed@eng.psu.edu.eg.
Abstract:
This study developed a Python-based framework to predict the ultimate bearing capacity of shallow foundations on cohesionless soil, employing machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) techniques. Utilizing a comprehensive dataset of 116 footing experiments, Eleven ML models (Gaussian Process Regression (GPR), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), Random Forest (RF), Categorical Boosting (CatBoost) etc.) and five DL models (Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Deep Neural Network (DNN), etc.) trained and compared against traditional methods. Input parameters included foundation dimensions and soil properties. Results demonstrated that ML and DL models significantly outperformed traditional equations, achieving higher accuracy. Ensemble methods like GPR, XGBoost, GBM, RF, and CatBoost exhibited superior performance, with a Coefficient of Determination (R2) values above 0.988 and a Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) below 5.07%. Conversely, traditional methods showed lower accuracy, with R2 values ranging from 0.684 to 0.82 and MAPE exceeding 19.63%. Taylor diagram analysis confirmed the improved performance of ML and DL. Additionally, a SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis highlighted foundation depth and soil friction angle as the most influential parameters, consistent with geotechnical principles.
Related Concept Videos
Behavior of Concrete Under Compressive Load
As the concrete specimen fractures under...
Dynamic Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete
The sonic test is a common method to determine the dynamic modulus. In this test, a concrete beam, sized either 6 x 6 x 30 inches or 4 x 4 x 20 inches, is clamped at its center. Vibrations are initiated at one end of the beam by an electromagnetic exciter unit powered by a...
Eccentric Loading
Resultant of a General Distributed Loading
Examples such as load distribution due to wind and load distribution on a bridge illustrate how this concept is used to analyze and design safe, reliable structures under variable loading conditions. Most structures, such as residential buildings, bridges, and towers, are...
Stresses under Combined Loadings
The process begins by slicing the tube at critical points and analyzing the internal forces and stress components at these sections, focusing on the centroid. Normal stresses, generated by axial forces and bending moments, are either compressive or tensile and vary across the section from...
Method of Superposition
When applying the method of superposition, each type of load—whether...
