Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 11, 2026

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
Published on: June 13, 2025
Requirements for Manual Knowledge Acquisition Tools: Systematic Literature Review and Expert Panel Consensus.
N van Brummelen1,2, J H Leopold3, S Medlock3,4
1Department of Medical Informatics, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. n.vanbrummelen@amsterdamumc.nl.
Developing effective knowledge acquisition (KA) tools requires a formal understanding of their requirements. This study outlines a comprehensive list of requirements for manual KA tools to guide researchers and developers.
Area of Science:
- * Decision Support Systems
- * Artificial Intelligence
- * Health Informatics
Background:
- * Knowledge acquisition (KA) tools are crucial for decision support content but lack formal requirement investigations.
- * Researchers often duplicate efforts when developing KA tools, highlighting a need for standardized requirements.
- * Existing literature provides limited guidance on the essential features and criteria for effective KA tools.
Purpose of the Study:
- * To establish a formal requirements list for manual knowledge acquisition tools.
- * To consolidate expert opinions and literature findings into a structured set of requirements.
- * To provide a foundational guide for the development of efficient and effective KA tools.
Main Methods:
- * A systematic literature review was conducted across Embase, MEDLINE, IEEE, and ACM databases.
- * Initial requirements were derived from literature review and expert team input.
- * An expert consensus process refined the initial requirements list, incorporating feedback.
Main Results:
- * The systematic review identified 3 relevant studies from 1628 initial records.
- * An initial list comprised 24 requirements and 15 sub-requirements.
- * Expert consensus led to the addition of 13 new requirements and 4 sub-requirements, resulting in a final list of 37 requirements and 21 sub-requirements across 4 categories.
Conclusions:
- * Significant gaps remain in understanding the specific requirements for KA tools.
- * The developed requirements list offers a preliminary yet valuable starting point for developers and researchers.
- * Formalizing requirements can reduce redundant development efforts and improve the quality of KA tools.
More Related Videos
12:55Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
Published on: September 27, 2020
10:39Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
Published on: August 29, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Documentation VII: EMR
Deductive Reasoning
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...