Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 11, 2026

Application of Ultrasound and Shear Wave Elastography Imaging in a Rat Model of NAFLD/NASH
Published on: April 20, 2021
Liver shear wave elastography using a mechanical index exceeding regulatory limits is safe and effective
Theodore T Pierce1,2, Kim Naja1, Scott J Schoen1,2
1Department of Radiology, Center for Ultrasound Research & Translation, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, United States.
Background:
Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease affects 1 in 3 people worldwide. Ultrasound shear wave elastography (SWE) in obese patients, the target population for testing, is hampered by beam attenuation, leading to unreliable liver fibrosis quantification.
Purpose:
We assess the safety and efficacy of increased push mechanical index (IPMI) above U.S. Food and Drug Administration limits to improve SWE.
Materials And Methods:
This single-center prospective trial (July 2023-April 2024) (NCT05792423) enrolled healthy adults stratified by body mass index (BMI). Participants underwent conventional push pulse (mechanical index [MI] 1.4) and IPMI (MI 2.5) SWE (GE Healthcare LOGIQ E10) performed by 1 of 3 sonographers and serial liver function testing (LFT) before and up to 7 days after imaging. Liver injury was defined as increased serum alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), or alkaline phosphatase (ALP) (non-inferiority margins: AST 7.5 U/L, ALT 12 U/L, ALP 17.5 U/L). Secondary endpoints included SWE variability and measurement number.
Results:
Twenty-two analyzable participants (mean age 39.6 ± 16.3 years; 15 women) had normal BMI (6), overweight (6), class 1 obesity (7), and class 2 obesity (3). Conventional shear wave speed was 1.34 ± 0.21 m/s, and IPMI yielded 1.36 ± 0.20 m/s (velocities ≤ 1.34 m/s indicate minimal or no fibrosis). The mean [95% CI] LFT change from baseline to day 1 was 1) AST: -0.86 [-2.34, 0.61], P = .24, 2) ALT: 0.32 [-1.04, 1.68], P = .63, 3) ALP: 1.73 [-1.02, 4.47], P = .21. The upper 95% CI for all biomarkers met non-inferiority criteria. Mean IPMI interquartile range (IQR) to median ratio decreased 0.019 (29.2% relative reduction) (P = .01) with 0.68 [IQR: 0.0.75] (P = .058), fewer average attempts.
Conclusion:
IPMI SWE in healthy volunteers did not cause injury and reduced measurement variability. IPMI SWE should be developed to improve examination quality and reliability in obese patients.

