Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 6, 2026

An in vivo Rodent Model of Contraction-induced Injury and Non-invasive Monitoring of Recovery
Published on: May 11, 2011
Segmental range of motion of vertebral body tethering: an in-vitro analysis of single-tether, double-tether, and
Marx Ribeiro1,2,3, Eduardo A Fancello4, Jana Seggewiß5,6
1Department for Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Halle (Saale), Ernst-Grube-Straße 40, 06120, Halle (Saale), Germany. marx.ribeiro@medizin.uni-halle.de.
Purpose:
Vertebral Body Tethering (VBT) is emerging as a promising approach for treating Adolescents with Idiopathic Scoliosis. This study aims to address the limited experimental research on vertebral body tethering by examining its biomechanical effects on the segmental spinal range of motion (ROM).
Methods:
Six human spine samples (T10-L3) were subjected to pure moment testing under four different conditions: native, and instrumentation with single-tether (T10-L3), double-tether (T11-L3), and hybrid (T12-L2) techniques in flexion (FL) and extension (EX), lateral bending (LB), and axial rotation (AR). The intersegmental ROM was measured from sensors inserted in each vertebra using an electromagnetic tracking system.
Results:
All instrumented cases preserved at least 80% of the native segmental ROM during FL-EX for all tested segments. In AR, all segments preserved at least 88% ROM mobility for single-tether and double-tether, or 65% for the hybrid technique. In LB, the ROM was reduced to 55% for a single-tether, 47% for a double-tether, and 29% for a hybrid system. The hybrid construct tended to relatively increase the ROM of adjacent levels near the titanium rod when compared with the single-tether or double-tether.
Conclusion:
This study provided experimental data on individual segment motion under VBT. The findings indicate that VBT techniques preserve a significant portion of FL-EX and AR ROM for all segments. However, the tested VBT constructs provide stability for the spine in LB.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Joints
Structural joint classifications are based on the material that makes up the joint as well as whether or not the joint contains a space between the bones. Joints are structurally classified as fibrous, cartilaginous, or synovial.
Fibrous Joints Are Immovable
The bones of a...
Introduction to Joints
Functional Classification of Joints
The functional classification of joints is determined by the amount of mobility between the adjacent bones. Joints are functionally classified as a synarthrosis or immobile joint, an amphiarthrosis or slightly moveable joint, or as a diarthrosis, a freely moveable joint. Fibrous and cartilaginous joints can be functionally classified as either synarthroses or amphiarthroses, whereas all synovial joints are classified as diarthroses.
Synarthrosis
An...
Structural Joints: Fibrous Joints
Suture
All the bones of the skull, except for the mandible, are joined to each other by a fibrous joint called a suture. The fibrous connective tissue found at a suture strongly unites the adjacent skull bones and thus helps to protect the brain and form the face. In...
Structural Classification of Joints
A fibrous joint is where the adjacent bones are united by fibrous connective...
Spinal Cord: Cross-sectional Anatomy
Gray Matter and its Components
Central to the gray matter is...

