Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 11, 2026

An Affordable HIV-1 Drug Resistance Monitoring Method for Resource Limited Settings
Published on: March 30, 2014
Sex differences in HIV testing in Catalan emergency departments
Neus Robert1,2, Emília Miró2,3, Jordi Llaneras2,4
1Emergency Department, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona.
Insights
Men were twice as likely to receive HIV testing compared to women in Spanish emergency departments. This sex-based disparity in HIV testing persists across all ages and settings, requiring urgent investigation.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Epidemiology
- Infectious Disease
Background:
- Undiagnosed Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection is a key factor in viral transmission within Western nations.
- The existence of a systematic, sex-based bias in physician-ordered HIV testing is not well-established.
- Emergency departments (EDs) are critical points for identifying undiagnosed infections.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate potential sex-based disparities in HIV testing frequency among women and men in emergency departments.
- To compare HIV testing rates between sexes within specific diagnostic groups and across various institutional settings.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 1.8 million emergency department visits across 11 sites in Catalonia, Spain.
- Data collection included patient sex, age, HIV test orders, and specific diagnoses (community-acquired pneumonia, herpes zoster).
- Statistical comparison of HIV testing rates between women and men, adjusting for age and hospital/ED characteristics.
Main Results:
- Women constituted 55% of ED visits but received only 38% of the 11,250 HIV tests ordered.
- Women had significantly lower HIV testing rates (0.43%) compared to men (0.86%), with an odds ratio of 0.50.
- This disparity was consistent across all age groups and hospital types, including specific diagnoses like pneumonia and herpes zoster.
Conclusions:
- A consistent, sex-based disparity in HIV testing by emergency physicians was identified, with women being tested less frequently than men.
- This bias was observed irrespective of patient age or the type of healthcare setting.
- The underlying reasons for this disparity are unknown and necessitate immediate research and intervention.
Objective:
Undiagnosed HIV infection remains a major driver of viral transmission in Western countries. Whether a systematic sex-based bias exists in HIV test ordering by physicians is unknown. We aimed to analyze the frequency of HIV testing among women and men attending 11 emergency departments (EDs) in Catalonia, Spain.
Methods:
We recorded the total number of ED visits and HIV tests performed, both overall and for two specific diagnoses included in an opt-in testing strategy: community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and herpes zoster. Data on patients' sex at birth and age were retrieved from administrative records, along with hospital (large vs. medium-small, metropolitan vs. nonmetropolitan) and ED characteristics (high vs. nonhigh activity, with vs. without gynecological facilities). The primary objective was to compare HIV testing rates between women and men, overall and by diagnosis. Secondary analyses evaluated results by age strata and institutional characteristics.
Results:
A total of 1.8 million patients (55% women) attended the 11 EDs over a combined period of 335 months (median: 33 months per ED). During this time, 11 250 HIV tests were ordered (38% in women), averaging 34 tests per ED per month. Women were significantly less likely to be tested than men [0.43 vs. 0.86%; odds ratio (OR): 0.50, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.48-0.52]. Among 31 515 CAP and 2990 herpes zoster cases, women also had lower testing rates (10.6 vs. 13.5% in CAP, OR: 0.76; 6.4 vs. 11.3% in herpes zoster, OR: 0.51). Results were consistent across all age groups and hospital/ED types.
Conclusion:
We identified a consistent sex-based disparity in HIV testing by emergency physicians, with women less likely to be tested than men, regardless of age or institutional setting. The causes of this bias remain unclear and warrant urgent investigation and corrective action.
Related Concept Videos
Sexually Transmitted Infections
Bias in Epidemiological Studies

