Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 10, 2026

Orthotopic Transplantation of Breast Tumors as Preclinical Models for Breast Cancer
Published on: May 18, 2020
Prevalence and predictive testing preferences for breast cancer treatment side effects
Maura K McCall1,2, Demesvar Destin3, Megan E Miller4,5
1Frances Payne Bolton School of Nursing, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA. mkm186@case.edu.
Introduction:
Women undergoing breast cancer (BC) treatment often face side effects that impact their quality of life and adherence. Biomarker tests to predict side effects could improve treatment options and adherence. This study assessed the prevalence of common side effects and women's preferences for biomarker testing.
Methods:
Data from surveys of patients with BC at University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center (UHCMC; N = 586) and Penn State Cancer Institute (PSCI; N = 562) were analyzed using descriptive statistics, chi-square, and Mann-Whitney U.
Results:
In the UHCMC and PSCI cohorts, 53.2% and 60.2% of the women prescribed endocrine therapy experienced joint and musculoskeletal pain (JMSP), respectively, with approximately one third discontinuing or changing treatment for BC. JMSP was associated with a higher mean body mass index (BMI). Over half of the women experienced hot flashes which were associated with younger age and Black race. Of the women receiving chemotherapy, nearly two thirds experienced neuropathy. Approximately one quarter of the respondents reported lymphedema, which as associated with a higher mean BMI, chemotherapy, and Black race. Quality of life was negatively impacted by side effects. Most women who experienced a side effect were more likely to prefer having a predictive test with the exception of women who experienced taxane-induced peripheral neuropathy.
Conclusion:
Side effects from BC treatment negatively affect quality of life and could be mitigated if their likelihood was known. Since the majority of BC patients view predictive biomarker testing favorably, future work focusing on treatment side effects is crucial to improve adherence, particularly to endocrine therapy.
More Related Videos
06:46Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
06:28E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
Sensitivity is the...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Cancer Survival Analysis
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...