Quality of Postoperative Recovery in Older Patients Undergoing Day Surgery: A Randomized, Non-Inferiority Trial of Remimazolam versus Etomidate for Anesthesia Induction
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 10, 2026

Author Spotlight: A Non-Intubated Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery with Multimodal Analgesia and Sevoflurane Inhalation Anesthesia
Published on: May 26, 2023
Jia Liu1,2, Sheng Hu3, Erfei Zhang4
1Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Xijing Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, People's Republic of China.
Introduction:
This study compared the quality of postoperative recovery among older patients undergoing day surgery with induction using remimazolam or etomidate.
Methods:
This multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, double-blinded trial with a non-inferiority design was conducted in three tertiary university hospitals. Older patients undergoing day surgery were randomly assigned to receive either remimazolam or etomidate for pump-induced general anesthesia. The primary outcome was the 15-item Quality of Recovery (QoR-15) score on postoperative day 1 (POD1). The mean difference between the groups was compared against a non-inferiority margin of -8. Secondary outcomes included the QoR-15 score on POD2, scores for the five QoR-15 dimensions, and vital signs at predefined time points.
Results:
In total, 118 older patients were randomized to the two groups. In the per-protocol set, the QoR-15 score on POD1 was 133.7 ± 12.9 in the remimazolam group, versus 131.2 ± 17.3 in the etomidate group, with a mean difference of 2.5 [95% confidence interval [CI]: -3.2, 8.2). In the modified intention-to-treat set, the QoR-15 scores were 133.5 ± 12.9 and 131.2 ± 17.6 in the remimazolam and etomidate groups, respectively, with a mean difference of 2.3 (95% CI: -3.3, 7.8). The lower limit of the confidence interval exceeded the predefined non-inferiority cutoff of -8, confirming the non-inferiority of remimazolam (P < 0.001). We compared the QoR-15 dimension scores on POD1 with the baseline scores in both groups. In the remimazolam group, only the physical independence score on POD1 was higher than at baseline, whereas in the etomidate group, the total QoR-15, physical comfort, physical independence, and emotional state scores were all lower on POD1 than at baseline. During anesthesia maintenance, the remifentanil dosage was higher in the remimazolam group than in the etomidate group (890.1 ± 5.7 µg vs 745.1 ± 45.3 µg, P = 0.037).
Conclusion:
In older patients undergoing day surgery, remimazolam exhibited non-inferiority to etomidate for anesthesia induction in terms of QoR-15 scores on POD1.
Related Concept Videos
Stages of General Anesthesia
Parenteral Anesthetics: Overview
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
General Anesthesia: Overview
General anesthesia induces unconsciousness in the whole body, while the others target specific areas or sensations. It is administered to minimize adverse effects, maintain...
Sedatives and Hypnotics Drugs: Miscellaneous Agents
Melatonin congeners like ramelteon (Rozerem) and tasimelteon (Hetlioz) selectively bind to melatonin receptors (MT1 and MT2) and thus mimic the actions of melatonin, a hormone that regulates sleep-wake cycles. Tasimelteon is primarily used for non-24-hour sleep-wake disorder, common in blind patients. They are also used to treat conditions like insomnia...
Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Stability-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence

